Nomination of Liquid inspiration podcast for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liquid inspiration podcast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid inspiration podcast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. dci | TALK 00:44, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Liquid inspiration podcast

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Liquid inspiration podcast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, C.J Hixon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Hello C.J Hixon. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Liquid inspiration podcast, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, C.J Hixon. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 01:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Will post something else here in a moment or 6 Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

How to get started

edit

There's LOADS of stuff, most of it confusing as hell, all written by well intentioned folk. Not to be outdone I wrote User:Timtrent/A good article whcih seems to go down well with folk.

Your podcast article is, for the moment, likely to fail. You'll be upset at that, but don;t waste grief on it for more than 5 minutes. Wikipedia is a lousy place to promote one;s own work with because it just plain doesn't work. Links to external sites have the attribute rel="nofollow" in them and your site gets no value and trivial traffic. So forget about Wikipedia as a promotion tool. If the podcast is already notable, find the WP:RS articles and use them as citations for a future article you draft in your user space if this one gets deleted. There may be time to find and add WP:RS links to it, but I tend to doubt that. If it does get deleted, that;s Ok. the work won;t be lost of you ask the deleting admin to "userfy" it for you. You can work on it in your user space without much chance of interruption.

There are far better ways of promoting your enterprise than using this place. One of the best is Twitter, where self promotion is expected. Here it is so deprecated that folk get very cross about it. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just checked (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL). If you check each of these links against WP:RS I think you'll agree that you are not yet notable. It's a bummer, but it's true. So, for the moment, upsetting though that is, your efforts to get LIP on Wikipedia are unlikely to succeed. When you're famous, Wikipedia will be ecstatic to have an article on it/you, but ideally written by someone else. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks man, you see now I understand... More famous you say... hmmm... Bet you that pint I can do that before the year is out! Thank you for clearing this up for me, seriously you are much more help than everyone I have encountered. Cheers! C.J Hixon (talk) 01:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Since you're here, learn to edit Wikipedia. Heck there's material here enough for a dozen podcasts. This place is not gentle and isn't very friendly. Starting to edit here is like walking into a Travellers' pub in Essex wearing a city business suit. Heads turn and folk point at you. Until you show them you're Ok, that is. Then it all works pretty well. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've parked it here: User:C.J Hixon/Liquid Inspiration Podcast for you to play with in case it gets deleted. Well it will get deleted. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply