Byronmercury

Userboxes

This user has been on Wikipedia for 11 years, 11 months and 12 days.

2,000+This user has made more than 2,000 contributions to Wikipedia.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Economics.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Classical music.

Greatest Composers of the 20thC

This is not a list of personal favorites, but is based on objective criteria (see below).

• 1 Debussy, Claude
• 2 Ravel, Maurice
• 3 Rachmaninov, Sergei
• 4 Strauss, Richard
• 5 Prokofiev, Sergei
• 6 Shostakovich, Dmitri
• 7 Mahler, Gustav
• 8 Stravinsky, Igor
• 9 Britten, Benjamin
• 10 Sibelius, Jean
• 11 Gershwin, George
• 12 Vaughan Williams, Ralph
• 13 Bartók, Béla
• 14 Poulenc, Francis

Based on number of recordings available for composers born after 1860. This is an objective "cloud" measure of popularity: people think it worthwhile to make a recording and others to buy it. Number from arkivmusic is in third column. Can shorten it: e.g. exclude those not living after 1930 (exit Debussy, Mahler) or 1940 (exit Ravel). A later birth date (1870 or 1880) can be used, but this raises anomalies: most of Sibelius famous work (symphonies, violin concerto) is post 1900; Strauss wrote his most famous and popular work (four last songs) in 1948. Two observations. The twentieth century is dominated by the Russians and the French. Also, the Brits d better than I thought: Britten and VW are popular around the world. Germans have to rely on the late romantics and have not created anything music wise to replace this.

Comments welcome!Byronmercury (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Die schweigsame Frau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kaiser Wilhelm and Lady Macbeth of Mtensk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanzsuite aus Klavierstücken von François Couperin, TrV 245 has been accepted

Tanzsuite aus Klavierstücken von François Couperin, TrV 245, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taylor Contracts (economics) has been accepted

Taylor Contracts (economics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calvo (Staggered) contracts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Woodford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Calvo (staggered) contracts) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Calvo (staggered) contracts, Byronmercury!

Wikipedia editor Lakun.patra just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great Work !!!!

To reply, leave a comment on Lakun.patra's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Labour economics

I see you are a lecturer on economics, can you review the edits made to the labour economics article from 22 March to 25 March? Some(but not all) of the old material was unsourced, however the neoclassical perspective is more widespread in economics courses than the older labour theory of value, the article therefore ought to give a balanced view of the different theories. Lbertolotti (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

will take a look! Byronmercury (talk) 10:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonata for piano in B minor, Op. 5 has been accepted

Sonata for piano in B minor, Op. 5, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Horn Concerto No 1, Opus 11 (Richard Strauss) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Horn Concerto No 1, Opus 11 (Richard Strauss), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

New discussions on Portal:Capitalism

Here, your input is appreciated.Lbertolotti (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horn Concerto No 1, Opus 11 (Richard Strauss) has been accepted

Horn Concerto No 1, Opus 11 (Richard Strauss), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Calvo (Staggered) contracts concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Calvo (Staggered) contracts, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piano Concerto No. 2 (Shostakovich), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic FM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Keynesian economics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Gertler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Music

Women in Music
	10 to 31 January 2016 Please join us in the worldwide virtual edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red.

--Rosiestep (talk) 04:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Zueignung

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wandrers Sturmlied, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Winternacht) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Winternacht, Byronmercury!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks great! I was looking around on Google Books for some online-accessible citations to add some commentary and added a few extra quotes. Hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Categories

Hello, please don't add parent categories to articles as you did on the Strauss song pages ... Category:Songs by Richard Strauss is already in the German songs and Lieder categories so the latter do not need to be directly added to the page. I've undone all your similar additions. Thanks! Graham87 13:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

87 Will do, I have only just understood how the wikipedia category system works. The listing works the opposite way around to most other systems. Byronmercury (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ständchen (Strauss), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Ständchen (Strauss) has been nominated for Did You Know

I was a bit too ecstatic ;) - Please add a few more citations. If the line about popularity can't be sourced, the article can live without it ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I will see what I can do! Byronmercury (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Die Tageszeiten, from its old location at User:Byronmercury/Die Tageszeiten. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Die Tageszeiten has been accepted

Die Tageszeiten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Worldbruce (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Taillefer

A few questions, - confessing that I am new to the piece ;) - Why is that a Choral composition? It looks like a cantata to me, with the choir not even playing a key role. The German Wikipedia says "Kantate". - Can you source it for DYK (just section "forces", - we have also an article Divisi), - the "huge orchestral sauce" should be known better? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Gerda Arendt. The Proms introduced me to it 18 months ago. Yes, Cantata is the correct terminology: thanks for that. The "huge orchestral sauce": the only source I can find for this is Suzanne Lodato (as referenced). I have added her reference to the Allgemeine Zeitung along with the German (perhaps you can access this online?). Divisi is not the right term here. The sections are divided throughout the piece (like first and second violins): divisi happens when a single section is temporarily divided into two. And thanks for your contributions to the various pages I created - Habe Dank!Byronmercury (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Die Tageszeiten

On 9 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Die Tageszeiten, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard Strauss composed Die Tageszeiten, setting poems about four times of the day, for the men's chorus that serenaded him for his 60th birthday? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Die Tageszeiten. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Taillefer (Strauss)

On 19 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taillefer (Strauss), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Strauss composed the cantata Taillefer, based on a romantic medieval tale and set for three soloists, an eight-part choir, and a large orchestra, for the centenary of the Heidelberg University? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taillefer (Strauss). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Taillefer (Strauss)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Befreit

On 1 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Befreit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard Dehmel (pictured) said that "Befreit", the Lied setting of his poem by Richard Strauss, was "a little bit too soft compared to the text, but it appeals to most people"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Befreit. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Befreit), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Precious

concentrate on Strauss

Thank you quality articles on compositions such as Befreit and Zueignung, "concentrating on Strauss this year", for detailed background and an exquisite choice of images to illustrate poetry and music, for a clear economic user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1370 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks Gerda Arendt! I have been a bit busy recently, but hope to resume Wikipedian activities over the summer....Byronmercury (talk) 19:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Two years now, and I am expanding "Heimliche Aufforderung". In all songs using the lang template, titles need to be changed to no italics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Ständchen (Strauss)

On 26 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ständchen (Strauss), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Ständchen" (Serenade), by Richard Strauss, begins with an appeal to creep out quietly and ends with a climax of expecting a rose to glow from the rapture of the night? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ständchen (Strauss). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ständchen (Strauss)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Nice to see his First Symphony! What do you think of: you nominate it for DYK, and I watch it? (You click on Main page, in the upper left, then on "Nominate an article" below the DYK section, follow the instructions, - it's rather easy.) - Have the rose that I picked to illustrate the above, with thanks ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda Arendt! I have been wanting to do this for a while. Sure, why not - I will nominate it as you suggest. Just have a couple of things to do more and then it should be fit. Feel free to edit it in th emeantime.Byronmercury (talk) 08:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt! My first self nominate on DYK: I hope I followed the instructions correctly. Anyway, lets see what happens. I will review another DYK.Byronmercury (talk) 15:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Good, you did a lot right! Next time, use your username unchenged, and don't get rid of the question mark at the end, - I hope I fixed it ;) - I think we wait a while if somebody else reviews it, I feel a bit biased. No date connection, no deadline. If you ask me, I'd drop the year at the beginning. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Symphony No. 1 (Strauss)

On 2 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Symphony No. 1 (Strauss), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1880, the sixteen-year-old composer Richard Strauss wrote his First Symphony in just three months, whilst still at school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 1 (Strauss). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Symphony No. 1 (Strauss)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Strauss may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• two concertos for horn, which are still part of the standard repertoire of most horn soloists ([[Horn Concerto No 1, Opus 11 (Richard Strauss)|Horn concerto No. 1 ]] (1883) and Horn concerto No

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Strauss, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elektra and Alfred Newman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Byronmercury. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Byronmercury. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Byronmercury. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)