October 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Robynthehode. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Intelligent design movement have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 06:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andes physics tutor edit

 

The article Andes physics tutor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are insufficient to demonstrate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:AndesSplash5.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AndesSplash5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply