Welcome! edit

  Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia!

Hello, Bugala, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

    Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    How to edit a page
    Help
    Tips
    How to write a great article
    Manual of Style
    Be Bold
    Assume Good faith
    Keep cool
   Share your knowledge
    Get adopted
    Neutral point of view

And here are several pages on what to avoid:

  How to avoid Copyright infringement
  How not to spam
  Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this
  The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might be interested in the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your editing; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome! CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Rami Samuel Kivisalo edit

 

The article Rami Samuel Kivisalo has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, verifiable sources should also be reliable, that is, media outlets of significant measure so as to add notability to the topics they cover. A local newspaper, or unknown website would not be considered reliable; nor would Facebook, YouTube, or MySpace pages (unless they are presentations of non-trivial, directly related information in articles already proven notable). More than one well-established media outlet that covers the subject in a non-trivial way will be more effective. Also, consider revising your content to meet a more encyclopedic tone; resources like "How to write a great article" and other informative tips can be found in the welcome message at the top of your user page here. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 00:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your article has been moved to AfC space edit

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Bugala/draft article on Rami Kivisalo has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/draft article on Rami Kivisalo, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 19:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply