Buddhafollower

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kalhana, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kashmiri Brahmin. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Kashmiri Brahmin. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sitush (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive or inappropriate editing, as you did at Agrawal, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. AnwarInsaan (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kashmiri Pandit, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 03:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Kashmiri Pandit

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. EdJohnston (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Muhammad Iqbal, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kalhana. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Yāska. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kalhana. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Kalhana, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. As far as I am concerned, your continued adulteration of what the sources say for this article now constitutes vandalism, ie: a deliberate disruption of the Wikipedia project. Do this once more and I shall seek intervention from an administrator. Sitush (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Your recent editing history at Kashmiri people shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Slow edit-warring at Kalhana

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kalhana. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You persist in adding the unsourced claim that Kalhana was a Kashmiri Pandit. The latest addition is here but you've been doing this for months. You never provide a source, and in your entire history on Wikipedia you have never left a talk comment. If you persist in making controversial changes with no evidence of consensus, you may be indefinitely blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Saraswat Brahmin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tajik and Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Saraswat Brahmin, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 16:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Noon Chai. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Kashmiri people. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Saraswat Brahmin. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sitush (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 20:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Discussion is not optional

Buddahafollower,
I'm sorry, but I've had to block this account because you are refusing to discuss your edits with people when they have concerns or questions. This is a collaborative project, so discussion is not optional. I'll unblock this account when it appears you've started to discuss things with other editors here on your talk page; any other admin is invited to unblock you once that happens without the need to talk with me first. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

All you have to do is demonstrate a willingness to talk and an understanding of how the policies of Wikipedia apply. It is not a lot to ask, and there are plenty of people who are prepared to listen and to help you to understand. Please, have a think. - Sitush (talk) 02:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Reading the following might help: WP:DISCUSS, WP:IDHT. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)