BubbleDude22
Map edit
Dear BubbleDude22, I notice you have added a little map to the developed country article. I think there is a little problem with it.
It is labeled the Developed Country Club in Blue. Also adds Bermuda, Israel, South Africa, and the European ministates.
I think the map here might be better just as the OECD the Developed country club in Blue. (i.e. without Bermuda, Israel, South Africa, and the European ministates in blue.)
The CIA in the list above as one its definitions of developed countries is the OECD+Bermuda, Israel, South Africa, and the European ministates.
I was thinking about editing the map - but I don't know how to :) Anyway best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 23:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC))
Test edit to "Ötzi the Iceman" edit
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ötzi the Iceman worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. — Cheers, Truth's Out There –talk– 14:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of FinallyFast.com Antispyware edit
A tag has been placed on FinallyFast.com Antispyware, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Spotty11222 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Netcom3 Cleaner edit
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Editor437 (talk) 00:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, that automatic warning is outdated ... "attack pages" aren't just pages that attack a person, they're also pages that make claims that a company is doing something illegal or outrageous without providing any sources to back up the claim. Although I was able to find some sites around the web that considered Netcom3 Cleaner 2.0 to be "rogue" software, McAfee's SiteAdvisor claimed its nuisance value was "0", and said: "In our tests, this download was free of adware, spyware and other potentially unwanted programs." CNET also didn't feel that threatened by this software. It's clearly crappy software, but if you want to write an article about it, cite your sources, and don't say more than the most reliable sources say. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 01:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Greetings... edit
Hello, BubbleDude22, and welcome to Wikipedia!
AfD nomination of Denmark–Mexico relations edit
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Denmark–Mexico relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark–Mexico relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of FinallyFast.com edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article FinallyFast.com, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Highly critical page without any reliable sources. Complete opposite opinion text from previous edit also had verifiability problems. Article needs to either get reliable source citations of the subject's rogue status, or needs to be deleted.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Closeapple (talk) 19:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Philippines–Romania relations has been nominated for deletion again here edit
You are being notified because you participated in a previous Afd regarding this article, either at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Argentina–Singapore_relations or at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines–Romania relations, and you deserve a chance to weigh in on this article once again. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 00:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Jamaica–Mexico relations) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Jamaica–Mexico relations, BubbleDude22!
Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I enjoyed reading your new article on Jamaica–Mexico relations. Very nice.
To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!