User talk:Bsadowski1/Archives/2011/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bsadowski1. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hello...
I guess little Desmond is missing his playmate already. Aw, shucks. :) I just came by to say goodbye and I'm still playing whack-a-vandal. I'm outta here; drop me an e-mail when you have a moment. Thanks for everything, my friend. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
My recent taggings
Thanks for the message, i've read the difference about blocked and banned. I'm sorry if my confusion gave you problems. Good work, regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 06:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
| “ | And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God. | ” |
| — (Alma 7:10) | ||
The Thing T/C is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Banned sockpuppets--how can I tell which one?
I see you removed comments by User:Archiving and User:Bookwormy2, and blocked them both as socks of a banned user. However, from looking at their pages, I don't see any like to an SPI; I was just curious to see who the master account is (and how you determined that they were socks). (I'm watching, so you can reply here) Qwyrxian (talk) 03:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Their master account has been blocked and banned for years. Since 2006 to be exact. I knew it was them because of their behavior. --Bsadowski1 03:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Thanks for the block, maybe you could RevDel his edits too? --Dylan620 (t • c • r) 00:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Way ahead of you, thanks. --Bsadowski1 00:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Bambifan returns?
Thanks for looking into this potential Bambifan sock. I posted an SPI case for it here, in case you need it. Honestly, not sure if you heard from someone else or saw this first; the two users who normally are good at handling BF101 are all but retired, and I didn't know exactly who to contact to take care of this quickly. --McDoobAU93 03:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's definitely Bambifan. I blocked it, as of now, for 2 months. Hope that's a good amount. --Bsadowski1 03:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
Thanks
Thanks for applying the semi-protection on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Possible proxy
See Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Archives/Unblock/2011/January#120.28.64.74 for the current location of your comment. (The ClueBot already got that entry and archived it). Do you think it's likely that 120.28.64.74 can be activated as a proxy on port 8080? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- I can't access anything when testing it. So I guess it's not a workable proxy. --Bsadowski1 05:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
Hey
There is an account who I believe might be a sock of one that you recently blocked. But I cant bring it up here at Wikipedia as its a violation of my topic ban. I have now asked the admin that sanctioned me and he have said that I am allowed to send of-wiki information to admins about socks. Can I send this information to you? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 16:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Can you review...
The block on User_talk:Matt-eee#Block? It was applied by User:KrakatoaKatie as a blocked proxy, but she is unable to re-assess as she has the flu. Thanks. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)