Bryanbaldecanas

October 2021

My Idea on GOLD Standard, now that we are Digitize, just like BITCOIN, Gold Standard should be the basis for Countries currency value, when one country transact to another country (this transaction should be digital). The country buying for Crude Oil will send a GOLD (by there Reserves at their Central Bank audited Globally), this GOLD will pass thru the FedRes get the value of their Currency (the Buyer) and send it to the Seller of the Crude Oil (with the value of their currency with respect to their GOLD Reserves in their Central Bank). G77 of the United Nations has this GOLD Valuation by AVERAGE. Thats it. And I think we are on AVERAGE, Humans do the Average and think the excess GOLD in exchanging (One Gram of Gold of a Particular Country Valued at Half Gram of Gold by the other Country, so the Federal Reserve gets the Half)and are or is for the Employees and Interests like Banks do with their Depositors, make Highways and other Development to other Nations and THINK BACk why we do not do the AVERAGE??.

January 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bamboo Organ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Yeah I know the Masons...if you really like to, you can delete that word "conive" that is our work long before you been here

Your submission at Articles for creation: BlindPail approximation of pi (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BlindPail approximation of pi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BlindPail approximation of pi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bryanbaldecanas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

This is the English Wikipedia

Contributors to the English Wikipedia are expected to edit or post in English. Your contributions suggest that you only have a rudimentary grasp of English as they are mostly incomprehensible. Please do not contribute further. Please see WP:CIR for further information on the policy on this matter. 109.155.148.247 (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Burabod (Poblacion), Gandara, Samar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Burabod (Poblacion), Gandara, Samar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Antonio M. Bolastig moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antonio M. Bolastig, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio M. Bolastig (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonio M. Bolastig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Antonio M. Bolastig, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio M. Bolastig (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antonio M. Bolastig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Antonio M. Bolastig, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:BlindPail approximation of pi

Hello, Bryanbaldecanas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BlindPail approximation of pi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:BlindPail approximation of pi

Hello, Bryanbaldecanas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BlindPail approximation of pi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm Constant314. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Resistor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Constant314 (talk) 15:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wow! signal. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. David J Johnson (talk) 11:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lunar Roving Vehicle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Constant314 (talk) 23:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cracker, you may be blocked from editing. Your characterization of "cracker" as a joke was incorrect. Try not to add incorrect information to the encyclopedia. Constant314 (talk) 00:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eve, you may be blocked from editing. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 16:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tetragrammaton. SaltySaltyTears (talk) 17:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Burabod (Poblacion), Gandara, Samar

Hello, Bryanbaldecanas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Burabod (Poblacion), Gandara, Samar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Unconstructive contributions

Your August 22&23 contributions did not seem constructive as they were either your original research, or testing. All contributions need to be supported by inline citations to reliable sources. Please refrain from further unconstructive editing. Ponor (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kent G. Budge. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Erosion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

I have made a fairly extensive investigation of your editing history, from your first edit in January to your most recent editing today. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any significant constructive editing at all, while I have found considerable quantities of editing which has been unhelpful, and has had the effect of taking up time and work of editors who could have used the time more constructively on other tasks, so your editing has indirectly led to damage to other parts of the encyclopaedia. (The fact that almost all of your editing has been reverted or deleted is an indication of this.) There are numerous messages on this page expressing concerns about your editing, and I do not need to repeat all of what has been said, but the problems include the following. You have frequently added content to articles without any citations to sources to indicate where you got the information from, and indeed in many cases it is clear that you have just made it up yourself. (The need for citations to sources has been pointed out to you repeatedly.) Sometimes you have posted material which is complete fantasy. You have virtually never responded at all to messages from other editors expressing concerns about your editing, and on the one and only occasion when you did so (almost 5 months after the message to you was posted) your response was complete nonsense, not in any way relating to the message it purportedly was a response to. Furthermore, your grasp of the English language is nowhere near adequate to contribute to an encyclopaedia in English, and while you might be able to choose to stop doing other unconstructive things, it is unlikely that you can choose to start writing coherent English.

In view of the above considerations, and further problems, it seems that your presence is damaging, rather than benefitting, the encyclopaedia. I have therefore blocked your account from editing. I am sure this will be very disappointing to you, but the purpose of allowing editors to edit is to enable them to improve the encyclopaedia, and if an editor is not doing that, but is causing damage, allowing them to edit does not serve any useful purpose.

It is possible for you to submit a request to be unblocked. To do that, you should first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with appropriate text. However, I think it only fair to advise you against making an unblock request, because the problems with your editing are of such a kind that I see no prospect of your being able to edit constructively here, so time spent on asking to be unblocked is likely to be wasted. I say that with sincere regret, because I am a great believer in giving blocked editors another chance. JBW (talk) 20:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

my_VIEW_on_my_Edits

I just want to read and edit an encyclopedia with the Truth, the Process, the Clarity of an Item within this without.

This editing I am making are for my Childrens so they will not be asking me no more when they need an explanation for a thing. I do not want them (my children) to read lousy terms and encyclopedic contents. This example includes to that of the Chinese article discussing on a Bamboo Poles for drilling a Petroleum. How do Bamboos can drill to the ground? It is a lousy discussions and needs some edits. The HO2 and H2O, like Carbon diOxide (CO2) and water (Hydrogen Dioxide) (HO2) they need an explanation for this. The Adam and Eve, how did they create some other Human Races with different colors when they are only the Couple who can reproduced their own?

Thank you and More Power...

Your draft article, Draft:Burabod (Poblacion), Gandara, Samar

Hello, Bryanbaldecanas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Burabod".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

IGLOOS and Construction . .why??

I know the Spherical Formulas and any other Curve, Arc form houses and method of construction, it is just like constructing an old bridges made of Stones with Arch form as support, the reason is the Important aspect of this House Building.

First, all they want is a Hot Place to stay with in and second they do not want that place to be open since the heat inside will go venting out. So Alaskan built their snow houses on a place where there are Fissures or any hot Steam, Water venting cause by Volcanic or Magma below Earth Surface, this Earth ventilations are the place they build an Igloo so to, to Trap the Heat venting out and put some controlled opening on this Houses.

They use the heated ice turn to hot water for as a mortar since hot water makes Ice melts and at that temperature it easily go back to solid form creating a solid joints on blocks of Ice.

And lastly, Lightning does not strikes in Alaskan region, as like the other Regions where Lightning strikes and create a Bush Fire or Forest Wild Fire, and Bushes or any Plants are Hardly or almost none on this area, And they even do not have fuel to maintain the lit of their fire.

Xi Jinping and Tsai Lng wen

Xi jinping is a communist President of China while Tsai Lng wen is the Democratic President of China, both based in Taiwan controlling the mainland, Xi Jinping wants the Country to be totally a Communist Country, total communism is a Total Military system, there are no Civilians all served for the Government and for the Arms of the Country, officer (military works also in business entities) the problem here is not the ranking according to the Authoritarian Rule (Military System) which a Lower rank can be promoted to a higher rank by a warfare experience, remember you are holding a Gun here, so if a Military which do not have an experience on salestalk, caravansaries all about money making business, i am not so exposed on military system to be clear on lower level, like they told me that communism is all about equality like the same houses, the same number of children, the same number of mobile phones, the same number of cars, the same number among each other, I want the communism with a little police around so I can hang around by the street corner talk about everything and have no work/job or any other duty for everyday, I am an employee and I observe and watch people runs and client coming, i think that this people with this population will not have a business with us for five days completely (lahat ng kliyente ay meron araw araw sa ganyang bilang talagang walang maraming gagawin, pag abot ng hapon na oras wala na' wala ng tao) just like thinking of A MALLS with a Working Population that size, lahat ba ng malls na ito ay gumagana, yeah wierd they all are rolling even that ratio on income and store are that weird hahahaha...so what will be our work if we become a military?? hold guns and point it to us?? kaya nga tambay kasi konti lang naman ang kliyente walang magawa kaya mag sideline, Militaristic that rule of "{NO NOON BREAK" puwede ba kaming mag sideline habang bakante?? and thats democratic..