Re: Marry You edit

Was it released on iTunes/Amazon? Do you have a source for its radio add date? If not, then its not a single. That source only says it was released on 22 August with no proof. You need an iTunes/Amazon source to claim that its a single. Oz talk 04:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

A song can still chart even if its not released as a single yet. See "End of Time" and "Countdown" for example. Oz talk 04:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Its been sent to radio but not digitally released (iTunes, Amazon etc.) and we need a source with the official radio add date. Until now, lets just leave it the way it is. Oz talk 04:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
There is no radio adds date, at this time, for Marry You. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 06:32, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You mean page protection? That can only happen if an article has been vandalized several times by an IP user. Oz talk 05:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Read WP:VANDAL and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to Wikipedia. Oz talk 05:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the reminder! I'm busy in real life at the moment but if you have time you could create the article yourself, just click here to create it and I'll help with the information later. Oz talk 05:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Marry You is still not a single. People are downloading the song through the album. That is why it appears on the iTunes chart. Oz talk 22:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

See here Marry You is not there. Oz talk 01:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Count on Me (song) edit

 

The article Count on Me (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. Not useful as a redirect, as there are many other songs by the same title.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 06:02, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011 edit

 

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Marry You. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 00:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Template:Bruno Mars. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. As this is a second warning for this concern in the last 24 hours, please be aware that any further incidences of 3RR violations may be immediately reported to the 3RR noticeboard without warning. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 00:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Home alone 5 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Home alone 5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Home Alone 5 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Home Alone 5, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoriTalkContribs 07:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Home Alone 5 concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Home Alone 5, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Home Alone 5 edit

 

Hello BrunoMars123456789. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Home Alone 5.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Home Alone 5}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply