Brucet8585

Welcome Brucet8585!

Hello Brucet8585. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Scope creep, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost   Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, scope_creep^Talk 23:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Thanks for your message and encouragement. This was my first edit. I hope I did everything correctly, but if not please let me know. I will be creating a sandbox on my user page soon. Brucet8585 (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your message was inside the template so I moved it down. It was really good copyediting on Joyce Robertson. Please do the whole if your up for it. scope_creep^Talk 23:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know how to use the sand box to be more constructive. I edited this paragraph of the article in question because it was awkwardly written, a bit incomplete and not factually correct in that it described only one aspect of APCI - only the context of LC-MS. Admittedly I am new editor, but I thought as such I was encouraged to improve existing articles, including improvements in grammar, spelling and style, and presumably accuracy. True, this article had not been flagged, but if you read the first paragraph you can see that it is not well written. In addition, it only partially explained the topic of APCI, confusing the ion source withe the LC-MS sample inlet. This may not be obvious to anyone but someone in the field.

So, what did I do wrong? Do I need to seek specific guidance about when or how to edit an article, or did I do something technically wrong in the editing process? Brucet8585 (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I reverted it because you misspelled the header with your edit. Sea Cow (talk) 02:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Sea Cow, why didn't you just correct the typographical error instead? Cullen328 (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

If I see a typographical error, I normally fix it myself. Why it didn't happen this time? I'm not sure to be perfectly honest. Wikipedia is a learning process, mistakes happen. I'm going to call this situation an outlier in my realm of Wikipedia contributions. Sea Cow (talk) 02:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I apologize for my careless error in the header! I will pay more attention. Brucet8585 (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Brucet8585. Although I don't think your edit was "unconstructive", there could still be issues with it related to WP:INTEGRITY, WP:OR and WP:SYN. The statements you revised were supported by citations and your changes could've have changed the contextual relationship between article content and cited source. Do the changes you made still accurately reflect what the cited sources actually said? If not, then that's not a good thing and your changes probably should be undone, or you should find another source to support them. If the changes you made are based on your own knowledge or your own interpretation of the source, then that's not a good thing either. I don't know whether the sources that cited are good or bad, but the article content corresponding to each source should accurately reflect what the source is saying. If you just did copy editing, then that would fine; one of edits, however, seem to be more than a minor rewrite and that might not be a good thing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Sea Cow. Friendly ping Zindor (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Sea Cow, Brucet8585, Marchjuly, can I suggest moving any wider discussion of the content changes at APCI to APCI's talk page at Talk:Atmospheric-pressure_chemical_ionization? That way it will be more easily found by other editors who have an interest in the subject. Not taking my own advice here, but Bruce8585, I'd avoid describing it as one of the two ion sources commonly used in LC-MS, because "commonly" is a subjective term, and there are other ion-sources out there in fairly widespread use (APPI etc. have their devotees). I'm going to write a bit on the talk page now... Elemimele (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Brucet8585! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I find, or see a list of, the sandboxes I have created., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Brucet8585! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I copy text with references (citations) from my sandbox to an article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry French (scientist) has been accepted

Barry French (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 11:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I do have another article submitted for creation, which I am happy to have reviewed by an experienced editor to see if they have any comments, understanding it may take a few months. But I am glad that you pointed out that I am auto-confirmed. Although I don't have any immediate aspirations for creating more articles, I will continue to edit.Brucet8585 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SCIEX (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SCIEX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SCIEX, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Brucet8585! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Brucet8585! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I improve my article Draft:Sciex?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Simplifying of words on mitter curtain

On mitter curtain, numerous was changed to many, though was changed to although and many car washes was redesigned to the car wash. What is the reason of these changes along with word erasing and other word changing? Angela Kate Maureen Pears 14:38, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello User:Tropical Storm Angela. The banner at the top of this article said that it may require editing for grammar. I simply made some changes to do so and correct the language and simplify phrasing for easier reading. I believe that I did not change the content or information in any significant way. I hope that other Wikipedia editors would agree with my changes, but if you disagree you may appeal to them or revert any changes if you feel they are wrong.Brucet8585 (talk) 13:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SCIEX (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SCIEX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SCIEX has been accepted

SCIEX, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 03:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)