Brokkr
Introspection Article Revisions edit
Hello Brokkr,
I am currently in the process of editing the Wikipedia article on introspection for a university course project that is part in a larger joint inititive between the Association for Psychological Science and the Wikimedia Foundation. This initiative is tasked with improving the content and citation of Wikipedia articles pertaining to the discipline of psychology. As such, the article on introspection was identified by the initiative as an article in need of major revision, and I am attempting to make improvements. Here is a link to the project's homepage: link.
I noticed that you recently undid my first round of revisions, citing "... [a] massive addition of improper styling". In response, I must apologize for the red editing marks. These marks are part of the peer review process being used for this course project, and were only meant to be temporary. I had actually posted a disclaimer on the article's "Talk" page in addtion to a "ongoing educational project" banner in the hopes of avoiding situations such as this. However, due to your abrupt removal of my changes, I suspect there may be some major, underlying styling guidelines that I may be missing. Could you point me in the right direction, so as to avoid future misunderstandings as I move forward with the revision process? Or, was your objection based on the subject matter of my proposed changes/additions? If you have any expertise in a related psychological field, I would love to get your input.
I mean all this with respect. Please get back to me at your earliest convenience.
Crossfire8228 (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Me too! You know, Wikipedia was trying to be the first digital Unesco World Heritage Site (see here). That would definitely be cool.
Agent 78787 talk contribs 00:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)