Welcome edit

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-600px-en.ogv
A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Brodmont, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 18:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Great New York City Fire of 1845 edit

I've begun the review for Great New York City Fire of 1845, and would like your thoughts on a few points here. Overall this looks solid and quite close to promotion as a Good Article. Thanks a lot for your work on it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Good Article Barnstar
For your contributions to create Great New York City Fire of 1845 and bring it quickly to Good Article status. Articles contributed by college courses tend to have a bad reputation on Wikipedia, but your group's contributions prove that there's a lot that they can give! Thanks for all you've done on this one. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


I'm not entirely clear from the article history who is and isn't part of your group, but please share the above barnstar with everyone in your group who contributed; you're all welcome to add it to your user pages as a badge of pride if you like. (You can copy its code by going into "edit".)
I've reviewed 5-10 articles nominated for university courses, and this is the first one I've ever passed. So tell your teacher I said you deserve an "A"... -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Heh, I'll be sure to tell him that. Yes, I'll spread this barnstar around to the other team members. This is very exciting for us. Thanks so much for your attention to our article and your work as a reviewer. --Brodmont (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
My pleasure! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply