BrocadeRiverPoems

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, BrocadeRiverPoems, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! jlwoodwa (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Brocade River Poems 06:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Yes, welcome! I see you already found WP:WikiProject China—it's always wonderful to see a new editor in this space. Cheers! Remsense诉 20:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Brocade River Poems 20:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Jadwiga Maria Potocka

I was browsing cat:allprod and saw this. It’s rare that I approve of a PROD as strongly as this one (in fact I think the procedure should be banned for abuse as CSD and en bloc AfD suffice), but this page is useless.

In fact, it looks more like a quasi-hoax to me due to the multiple factual inconsistencies. Obviously there have been people that name (like the 19th century portrait sitter depicted there; by the way, Franz Xaver Winterhalter, the artist, died in 1867 IIRC 1873), but the article is pure fiction. Nice work spotting it.

Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 22:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

But also, as you’re a relatively new editor, please please please be circumspect about using PROD. It’s not a good way to deal with many of the pages that end up there and we have too many experienced editors already who like to bend the rules. Again, thank you. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 22:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

I thought it was strange that I couldn't find any factual evidence about the person or what information I found simply did not match with what was on the article. The chief reason I used PROD was it seemed like it wouldn't be controversial to delete it as the notification about lacking sources had been present since 2009 and I myself was unable to find any verifiable sources, and the article had been more or less untouched for awhile. I am unlikely to use PROD in the future, I understand your concerns. Brocade River Poems 22:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Also, regarding the portrait by Franz Xaver Winterhalter, that appears to be an Hr.Jadwiga Branicka z Potockich. Siostra Hr. Pelagii Potockiej. Portret autorstwa Franca Xawera Winterhaltera(1805-1873) per this and this. It also aligns with this source that says he painted Jadwiga Branicka née Potocka. Brocade River Poems 22:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

About Thomas Lockley's article

Hello. New information has been brought to us regarding Lockley's article. I've sent the same information to a few people in case they haven't noticed. Please check the contents if you wish. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Thomas_Lockley 153.248.52.69 (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I mean this with the utmost sincereity and respect I can muster -- I do not care. The only reason I participated in that talk page was trying to help narrow down when exactly he taught and at which institution. When I could not find anything conclusive, I moved on. Brocade River Poems 04:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Gējì

I don't feel competent to offer an "official" third opinion, but from reading through the debate, it's clear to me that you have the right of it.

Just thought I'd offer some encouragement, since it looks like two different users decided to take issue with the "prostitutes" descriptor, heh—hopefully, a more-qualified user than I will be able to convince 'em.

Cheers,

Himaldrmann (talk) 09:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

The ironic part of this is that I am not advocating in any way for the inclusion of the word "Prostitute" on the article. The other editor keeps adding mentions of prostitutes. All I suggested is that the lead should represent what the reliable sources say, which is that geji sometimes had sex with their clients. At no point did I ever say that the word "prostitute" should be added. Brocade River Poems 20:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)