Brobra694

Welcome to my talk page. This is where people of the community will post due to issues or other alarming things. Even some good things. Yeah. Brobra694 (talk) 15:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Brobra694, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brobra694! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Example of a Trick Image.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Example of a Trick Image.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Riverside Park, Glenrothes

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Brobra694, thanks for creating Riverside Park, Glenrothes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this. It has been tagged as uncategorised.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sir Andrew de Leslie II

The article Sir Andrew de Leslie II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not demonstrate notability. The only source is a family history written by a member of the family. Fails WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 14:27, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew de Leslie (d. c. 1352) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew de Leslie (d. c. 1352) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew de Leslie (d. c. 1352) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Norman de Leslie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman de Leslie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman de Leslie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 17:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Example of a Trick Image.png

The file File:Example of a Trick Image.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned and blank image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Example of a Trick Image.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Example of a Trick Image.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)