Brindt

February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Albin Kurti. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The man stephen 18:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I reverted to the last apparently usable (NPOV) version - the previous text was obviously copied and pasted from some newspaper report or similar. --Brindt 18:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Apologies, I have reverted back The man stephen 18:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, it's also my fault, I forgot the edit summary for the revert. --Brindt 18:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

MCI Management Center Innsbruck

Hello Brindt, thank's for reviewing my changes on the article about the MCI but I have a small question - why did you deleate my addition that the MCI offers Executive-Master’s degrees as well - which is a fact as you can check on the official homepage of the MCI. Thank's and best greetings, --ViGr (talk) 06:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

"Executive Masters" are not really a distinct kind of degree, and it seems fairly redundant to mention them explicitly in the summary section, which should be brief and to the point. There's a fairly detailed "Executive Education" section in the main text anyway. --Brindt (talk) 11:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

IU Vienna

Hallo Brindt! Da warst du etwas zu schnell (siehe WP:CRYSTAL). Die Schließung wurde angeordnet, ist aber noch nicht vollzogen. Zumindest habe ich vorgestern noch eine heit′re Studentengruppe in der Mondscheingasse gesehen. ;-) Servus aus Wien. Alfie↑↓© 21:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Imadec

Bist du sicher, dass dein Edit im Imadec korrekt ist? Die akademischen Grade, die in der Zeit der Akkreditierung als Privatuni und anschließend als LuC-Anbieter vergeben worden sind, sind jedenfalls gültig. Die LuCs liefen mit Ende 2012 aus. Allerdings gibt es für Anbieter mehrere Möglichkeiten, legal weiterzumachen. Die von LuC-Anbietern am häufigsten gewählte Form ist ein ULG in Kooperation mit einer Uni oder einer FH oder mit der DUK. Eine andere Möglichkeit ist die Vergabe ausländischer akademischer Grade (durch eine ausländische Hochschule, dazu muss man sich nur registrieren lassen). Aus der Website der Imadec (neu: imadec.at) geht nicht hervor, ob sie eine dieser Optionen gewählt haben oder ob sie überhaupt noch einen Studienbetrieb haben (ich vermute: nein). Wenn du dazu einen passenden Beleg hast, kann man das sicher ergänzen. Sonst scheint es mir eher empfehlenswert, auf Updates zu verzichten.--Wikiwatchers (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Auf http://www.bmwf.gv.at/startseite/hochschulen/registrierte_ausl_studien/registrierte_auslaendische_einrichtungen/ sind sie nicht gelistet. Eine institionelle Akkreditierung von IMADEC in Österreich sowie von irgendeinem ihrer Programme liegt offenkundig nicht mehr vor, weil sie gar keine geeignete Institution sind (Uni, Privatuni, FH/FHStudiengangsdurchführer, Päd. Hochschule usw.) Selbst wenn sie irgendwas mit einer Partnerhochschule (auch im Ausland) machen ändert sich daran nichts, in solchen Fällen ist ja die Partnerhochschule in der Verantwortung und der eigene Standort nur ein durchführendes Anhängsel. Dass die Grade aus früheren Zeiten legal sind geht m.E. aus dem Artikel hervor. Ich kann aber den Begriff "unaccredited" relativieren. --Brindt (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Europe Business Assembly.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pratyya ^(Hello!) 14:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Europe Business Assembly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Europe Business Assembly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europe Business Assembly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ColinFine (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Actually, you are over 3RR too, so, just keep away from the article for the moment. I am watching the situation. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks. --Brindt (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diplom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magister (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brindt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)