Welcome!

edit
Hello, BrianAnthonyVI, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for recognizing the benefits of becoming a registered user, creating your user/talk page, and your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you need help, check out useful resources & Getting Help below, ask on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page & add {{Help me}}. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) after your text entry, or by clicking   if shown, in order to produce your username & date. Please always fill in edit summary field with a brief description of your article or talk page edits (optional when just adding your communications on talk pages).
You can practice in your personal sandbox (add {{My Sandbox|replace with your user name}} on your user page for future easy access) or your user page. Masssly —Sadat (Masssly)TCM 23:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Sadat (Masssly)TCM 23:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

BrianAnthonyVI, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi BrianAnthonyVI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mentioning an appearance and over-relying on press releases

edit

Hello. Please be more careful when adding that people have appeared on a certain program. This appears to be promotional, since appearances are not, by themselves, all that noteworthy, especially not without WP:SECONDARY sources explaining why they're significant. Additionally, it would be a good idea to hold back on the use of press releases as sources. As a general rule of thumb, if the only thing you can find mentioning a fact is a press release promoting something, it's probably not worth including in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising. Thank you, Grayfell (talk) 02:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notes, Grayfell! I'm just learning how to use Wiki and I appreciate the help. I want to be a good contributor.

No problem. Good luck, and happy editing! Grayfell (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of GJ Reynolds

edit
 

The article GJ Reynolds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced BLP of dubious notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gamaliel (talk) 23:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

You deleted more than just the PROD notice. I reverted then deleted the PROD notice. JoeSperrazza (talk) 02:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of GJ Reynolds for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GJ Reynolds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ Reynolds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gamaliel (talk) 05:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply