Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (September 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 13:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Babs Official! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 13:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

COI username notice edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Babs Official", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 13:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (September 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (September 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Styyx was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm rejecting this. I've looked at the majority of the sources and see a clear pattern of promotional stuff/puffery and blogs. Some aren't articles but basically photo galleries. Coupled with the COI/UPE concerns it gives a picture that the purpose of this is just spam.
~StyyxTalk? 12:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Styyx, Is there any way I can make it as transparent as possible if the articles cannot prove our authenticity? I do try to make it as neutral as possible. But sometimes it's real for what we are mentioning. Please kindly help. Regards. Brbs.kh (talk) 08:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi. My honest take on this is that the subject isn't notable per WP:CORP due to the sources obviously being press releases/paid promotion and that it won't be notable in the foreseeable future, so I'd suggest to cease attempting to publish the page for some time. If you disagree with me you can always ask for additional opinions at the AfC help desk. ~StyyxTalk? 17:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Styyx, thanks for your information. Now, I have deleted all those links. Would you mind reviewing? Thanks for your help and support. Regards. Brbs.kh (talk) 08:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Styyx! Would you mind guiding me and allow me to edit my draft once again? Brbs.kh (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022 edit

 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Brbs.kh, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Brbs.kh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 11:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Please kindly help me change to Paid if there is possible to continue the project. Really appreciate your help, Bonadea. Brbs.kh (talk) 11:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for this disclosure. I see that you disclosed your paid status on the draft page itself; I will move it to the draft talk page, and I will also put a disclosure template on your user page for you. Note that this will not change the status of the draft, however. --bonadea contributions talk 12:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Really thankful for your guidance. I will try my best to look after the article with more detail as neutral as possible. Thanks, bonadea. Brbs.kh (talk) 13:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pleng Chan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Pleng Chan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia).

Please do not move rejected drafts to mainspace, and don't move any draft you were paid to create to mainspace.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 08:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sok Baraby (December 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Netherzone (talk) 22:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (December 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no sign of notability here. It's good that a lot of non-reliable sources were removed, but now the sources in the draft are Tripadvisor and the Yellow Pages, and neither of them is reliable, or shows notability – all they show is that the coffee shop exists, which was not in doubt.
bonadea contributions talk 19:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sok Baraby (January 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
echidnaLives - talk - edits 03:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

{{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 2606:54C0:3C80:0:0:0:23:1DB. Place any further information here. ~~~~}} Brbs.kh (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sok Baraby (March 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Sok Baraby. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Engr. Smitty Werben 17:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pleng Chan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pleng Chan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 15:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit


Hello, Brbs.kh. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Pleng Chan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat, as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sok Baraby edit

  Hello, Brbs.kh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sok Baraby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply