Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Sachs (January 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Modussiccandi (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Brandon Lapin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jana Sanchez for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana Sanchez, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Sanchez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Hello, Brandon Lapin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page James Kinsella (journalist and tech entrepreneur), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. KidAdSPEAK 22:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


BRANDON RESPONDS: I am a retired telecoms engineer. I am on NO ONE's payroll. I make contributions and edits when I know something about a subject that I think others should know about. Brandon Lapin (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Brandon LapinReply

Brandon Lapin: If you are not connected to Jana Sanchez, would you mind explaining how is it possible you are the copyright holder of a professional photo of her? File:Jana_close_up_DC.jpg. --MarioGom (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of James Kinsella (journalist and tech entrepreneur) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Kinsella (journalist and tech entrepreneur), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kinsella (journalist and tech entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brandon Lapin. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. - Bri.public (talk) 18:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Sachs (April 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: UPE Sockfarm creation.
scope_creepTalk 15:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Wendy Sachs edit

  Hello, Brandon Lapin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendy Sachs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Wendy Sachs edit

 

Hello, Brandon Lapin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wendy Sachs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply