User talk:Brandmeister (old)/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Brandmeister (old). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Possibly unfree Image:Belly of the beast.jpg
Possibly unfree Image:Gaius Caligula.jpg
Possibly unfree Image:Caesar Caligula.jpg
Fair use rationale for Image:Dospekhi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dospekhi.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Leger20t.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leger20t.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you - U.S. FAC
Hi,
Thank you for supporting the recent FAC of United States, but unfortunately it failed to pass. However, I hope you will vote again in the future. In the mean time, please accept this Mooncake as a token of my gratitude.--Ryz05 t 15:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Image Tagging for Image:Sie12.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Sie12.PNG. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Warning
You just created an article in the Requests section at the top of the Recent Changes page. Please remove it from the requests line now that it is a live link. Georgia guy 18:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Babek.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Babek.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 19:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Neftchala.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neftchala.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- OrphanBot is getting to be ridiculous. The copyright status is undetermined as indicated in the "fairuseunsure" tag. --Brand спойт 21:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Don-drakon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Don-drakon.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Can you add sources to the article, and add a paragraph? Right now it's not main page material. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-16 14:59
DYK
thank you for your interest in this article. i didnt expect it to be nominated for featured article so i did not originally do the exhaustive research. ive now visited most every nook and cranny and have expanded the article by about 60 percent. i hope you will revisit the article and let me know what you think. i am open to any ideas for expansion or improvement. it is a very rare plant with only two certain colonies at this point so there is not much info. no one ever published on it between its discovery in 1900 and monterey rediscovery of 1992. thanks Covalent 03:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
NK - thank you for the award!
Thanks for the award, trying to contribute as much as time allows. All the best, --AdilBaguirov 03:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Привет! Если быть точне, то это название переводится буквально не как "земля откуда нет возврата", а "если пойдёшь-не придёшь". уж больно "the land of no return" далеко от оригинала ушло.
И такой ещё вопрос. Куда нужно оставлять свои мессажи, чтобы написанная статья участвовала в "Did you know?" --Untifler 11:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Да, я знал этот перевод, но в моей версии он получился слегка громоздкий :) Статьи отправляются сюда под заголовок "Suggestions" и соответствующей датой. --Brand спойт 11:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Спасибо... Но я вижу там только даты, которые уже прошли. А где то, что обсуждается на будущее? --Untifler 11:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Например если ты закончил статью, вставляешь ее под текущей датой на самый верх. На будущее обсуждаются сегодняшние, вчерашние и вообще статьи созданные за 5 дней. --Brand спойт 11:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Your article, Ramana (settlement), was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 12:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Image:LegIIAvgvsta.jpg
Why should "Image:LegIIAvgvsta.jpg" be fair use?--Panairjdde 12:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I found no evidences for public domain. Apparently it's copyrighted. --Brand спойт 13:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Right. So why are you claiming that putting such image in Legio II Augusta article is "fair use"?--Panairjdde 13:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Because it's apparently copyrighted by 2006 Arts of Fairies, Inc. as indicated below. --Brand спойт 13:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Again right. So why are you claiming that using a copyrighted image in the way you use it is a "fair use"? fair use in Wikipedia means that the image is:
- "* Cover art. Cover art from various items, for identification and critical commentary (not for identification without critical commentary).
- Team and corporate logos. For identification. See Wikipedia:Logos.
- Stamps and currency. For identification.
- Other promotional material. Posters, programs, billboards, ads. For critical commentary.
- Film and television screen shots. For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television.
- Screenshots from software products. For critical commentary.
- Paintings and other works of visual art. For critical commentary, including images illustrative of a particular technique or school.
- Publicity photos. For identification and critical commentary. See Wikipedia:Publicity photos.
- Under which of these cases your use of said image falls?--Panairjdde 19:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- The tag clearly says: "this image is of a drawing, painting, print, or other two-dimensional work of art". Thus the fair use falls under paintings and other works of visual art. --Brand спойт 11:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Because it's apparently copyrighted by 2006 Arts of Fairies, Inc. as indicated below. --Brand спойт 13:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Right. So why are you claiming that putting such image in Legio II Augusta article is "fair use"?--Panairjdde 13:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Image:LegIIAvgvsta.jpg listed for deletion
Portal:Presidency
Hi - I've replied to your comment. Please take another look. Rama's Arrow 17:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Image:Ballack2.jpg source
An image you uploaded, Image:Ballack2.jpg, has incorrect source details; the uploaded image is not located at the given URL [1]. Please can you update the image's source URL and remove the no source tag? Thank you. --Muchness 03:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Question on Laskarid eagle.jpg
Hi Brandmeister!
Just wanted to ask if you could supply more information about the image of the Laskarid Eagle that you added to Wikipedia. You don't say where you found the image. To me, it doesn't look like something that was actually created in the 13th century, but rather a later copy or reconstruction. Could you tell me a little about the source? --Jfruh (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- I found it at http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Medieval/Byzantine.html which claims it to be of the Laskaris. However the inscription in the seal designates that the seal also belonged to Comnenes and Paleologs. --Brand спойт 20:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Fair-use image removed from your user page
Hello, Brandmeister. I've removed Image:Belly of the beast.jpg from your user page, as it is a copyrighted image that is being used under a claim of fair use. Unfortunately, by Wikipedia policies, no fair-use images can be used on user pages; please see Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images. This image has not been deleted from any articles. If you have any questions, please let me know. —Bkell (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Caesar Caligula.jpg)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Caesar Caligula.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gaius Caligula.jpg)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Gaius Caligula.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Bak ca.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bak ca.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 17:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Derevo.jpg
Image:Carlsson.jpg listed for deletion
Fair use rationale for Image:Janjucetus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Janjucetus.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Operation Cedar Falls
Many thanks for the contribution. I enjoyed reading the article. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 08:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
answer from VP:technical
Font size
The font size has reduced on the whole. Is it only in my browser? I once changed the size in preferences but it was perhaps Mozilla. Now I can't find such a thing. --Brand спойт 10:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's your browser. In IE, hold down the control key and move the scroll wheel on your mouse an you can change this (I think it takes affect when you release the control button). There are other ways to set this, but that is how I usually accidentally change this, to my confusion. RJFJR 16:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
There isn't any substantiated evidence of notability in this article, and I thought at first it was vanity. However, I see you started it and are an established editor. There should be more on shows/reviews etc to validate the entry. I wonder what your thoughts are on this. I've checked the artist's website but it doesn't really help much. Tyrenius 00:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Starting the article I thought it not to be a red link because wanted to illustrate some relevant article with his paintings. You may consider it to deletion. --Brand спойт 09:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Quite the hoax... thanks for the DYK contribution -- Samir धर्म 18:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Sweet. Thanks for the education! :) JayW 00:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:T-X laser.jpg)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:T-X laser.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 17:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Copyvio
Your introduction of the copyrighted image Image:T-X laser.jpg to an article in violation of the license for that image has been reverted. Please be careful that you don't violate image copyrights in the future. Thanks. --Yamla 14:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Translation request
I'm working on the article Maximilian von Alopeus, and found a source in Russian. Can you translate the 2nd part of that page, where it begins "2) Старший брат его, Максим Максимович (1748 - 1822)", and place the translation at Talk:Maximilian von Alopeus? Thanks. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-09-21 16:00Z
Style for company names
I see you're editing Pornography in the United States: I notice that company names are being put in quotes in that article: company names should simply be plain text, without quotes or other formatting applied. For example: Vivid Entertainment, not "Vivid Entertainment". -- The Anome 18:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits on the U.S. pornography article: I agree, it should be possible to start on the Featured Article process soon. More on company names: we should make a distinction between companies and the product they are famous for, and not use the terms synonymously: for example, Playboy (the magazine) is published by Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (the company). The same is true of several other enterprises mentioned in the article.
A quick summary of styles for things (see WP:MOS for more)
- Companies in plain text: Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
- Ordinary brand and product names in plain text: Coca Cola, Post-it note
- Books, movies, magazines, record albums in italics: A Tale of Two Cities, The Matrix, Playboy, Sargeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
- Short stories and individual songs in quotes: "The Telltale Heart", "Hey Jude"
Unspecified source for Image:J.A. Zajdel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:J.A. Zajdel.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Agitplakat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Agitplakat.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:3 i37611.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:3 i37611.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sandstein 11:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
re: Invitation
Thanks for the invite, but I'd rather spend my editing energies elsewhere. Katr67 16:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Flag of Moscow.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Flag of Moscow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. - Sherool (talk) 08:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rome rulez.jpg
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Rome rulez.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 00:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for creating new articles
Thanks for creating the new articles on Edgar Huff and Gilbert Johnson; and for adding them to the USMC Portal New articles list. I've expanded the Huff article and added an image from his official USMC bio. — ERcheck (talk) 11:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Georgius VI.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Georgius VI.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:M. Sharapova.jpg
Possibly unfree Image:M. Sharapova.jpg
- In the image description page you have written:
- PD-because|unless stated otherwise, all Maria Sharapova pictures according to source are believed to be in the public domain as either promotional stills, publicity photos, photoshoot rejects or press media stock
- I don't think the source can be trusted in this regard. (However I can't check what they say because you didn't provide a valid URL). Promotional stills, etc, are not public domain. At best they sometimes can be used under the fair use exemption. -Will Beback 22:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I was looking at a different listing of the URL. In any case, their word isn't definitive. So far as the U.S. copyright law, and Wikipedia policy are concerned, pubicity still are not automatically public domain. There isn't even evidence that this image is a publicity still. -Will Beback 22:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- I suggest you re-tag the image {Promophoto}. It may not be 100% accurate (since we don't know if the image is really promotional) but it is far closer to the actual situation. -Will Beback 22:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Promophoto and the like should only be used for images explicitly released as such. Given the site's message, it seems much more likely that it was scanned from a magazine. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 00:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
DYK
Mike Jackson
Hi. I wonder if the person appeared in "South Park's" "The Jeffersons" is not Michael Jackson then who it is? :) If it's Mike, then I think it's worth of inserting to the article --Brand спойт 02:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- It is not a real person, it is a cartoon made on a computer. The actual voice is not him either, and is displayed no doubt in the credits.--I'll bring the food 02:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- And what is going on with your talk page? it has hundreds of image complaints. --I'll bring the food 02:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)