User talk:Bovineboy2008/Archives/2010/December

section

What do you think of this section. I am not one to delete sections but this one I can make an acception. − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 16:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead and delete it. There aren't any sources and its poorly presented. BOVINEBOY2008 16:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Removed instructions of Category:Upcoming films

I was the one who put the instructions of {{film date}} (previously {{Upcoming film}}) in that page. Why was it removed? --Gh87 (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

It is an entirely different template with different application. You can add new documentation for {{Film date}} if you want, but it should be different than what it said for {{Upcoming film}}. BOVINEBOY2008 05:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter

The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

King of the Elves Logo

Hello this is Name13013 and i fixed the logo to show the correct file —Preceding unsigned comment added by Name13013 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Excellent work. BOVINEBOY2008 18:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Envy (film)

Hi, now that Envy (film) points to the disambig, could you help out cleaning up misdirected links per WP:FIXDABLINKS? --JaGa^talk 17:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Sure can! Thanks for the reminder! BOVINEBOY2008 00:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Super (2010 Indian film)

Dear Bovineboy2008, thank you for renaming the Super (2010 Indian film) page and for all the minor fixes. However, I have some reservations on the edit you made at Line 25 of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_%282010_Indian_film%29&diff=prev&oldid=400641807 The image was purposely aligned to Center so that it flows with the relevant text above the image (which discusses the film title which is the symbol contained in image). Kindly consider the same and let me know if I can change it back to Center and not right thumb. Thank you. Niri.M 09:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niri.M (talk • contribs)

I think that the center alignment does not work well. Instead of being an aid to the text, it interrupts it. I moved it to be left aligned, let me know what you think. BOVINEBOY2008 10:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

It's good enough. Thanks again. Niri.M 10:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niri.M (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free image File:Double Negative.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Double Negative.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 07:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

• News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive

• In the news: Amazon "shopping-enabling" Wikipedia; Al Jazeera interview; be like Wikipedia

• GLAM-WIKI London: British Museum hosts two days of talks between Wikimedia and the cultural sector

• WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak

• WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup

• Features and admins: Birds and insects

• Arbitration report: New case: World War II

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:44, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Stay Cool

I don't consider it an official release because it only had one showing in 2009. Since it wasn't released it theaters, I guess we can consider it an 2010 film, as it was released to DVD to several different places. And also, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't film festivals usually done for indie films so they can get a distributor? ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT 11:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't mean to offend, but we don't base this on your considerations. IMDb, Allmovie and Rotten Tomatoes all consider it a 2009 film. And we classify films by their first public release, no matter how limited it is. Even if we were to consider this a 2010 film based on the DVD release, would you consider this a direct-to-video film? I wouldn't. And in answer to your other question, many other films are first aired in film festivals even if they have distributors. BOVINEBOY2008 14:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Ice Age: Continental Drift

Hey I ask you to put a watch on this article. I am worried that some of the casts may be made up. − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 15:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Consider it done. I'll look for another source instead of IMDb to back this up too. BOVINEBOY2008 15:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok thank you. That's all I ask! :) − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 16:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject 4400

I noticed that you were a member of Wikiproject 4400. It appears that the project is basically dead but I wanted to check with some of the members before I drop an inactive tag on it. Is this project still active? --Kumioko (talk) 03:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

As far as I'm concerned it is dead. Once in a while there will be an edit to the main article, but that's the most I've seen. BOVINEBOY2008 05:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok thanks. --Kumioko (talk) 14:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Edits to cast section on Tron: Legacy Article

Hello. I noticed that you had undid my recent clarification edit to the Tron: Legacy article's cast section, and provided no justification for doing so. I had bolded character names, which is a common practice amongst many media related Wiki articles, especially those in which one person/actor portrays several characters. Before I attempt to redo my edit (which I'm sure you will have a compulsion to immediately undo again), I was hoping you inform me as to what your reasoning was behind undoing it in the first place? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zargabaath (talk • contribs) 17:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMCAST: "Neither the actor nor role name should be bolded." BOVINEBOY2008 17:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, thank you for that information. I have been contributing to Wikipedia for years and this was never the policy. Granted, the MOS' are constantly being updated with no notification to contributors. And although this is obviously a misinterpretation of the Wiki MOS that someone saw fit to apply to the MOS for films, I guess I have to abide by it now. Ironically, the boldface standard contains no references to justify how it's being applied in the Film MOS. Unfortunate, as it will inevitably cause confusion. Thanks anyway. Zargabaath 17:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zargabaath (talk • contribs)

The justification comes from MOS:BOLD, which advises against bolding for emphasis. If you think it is a misinterpretation, please bring it up at WT:FILM. Also, don't forget to sign your posts. BOVINEBOY2008 17:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

I am aware of where the "justification" comes from, however, bolding a character name is not done for emphasis, it is for clarification on the part of the reader; this is completely unrelated to the MOS:BOLD specifications, hence why I called it a misinterpretation. I would take it up at WT:FILM, but I'm sure you know as well as I do how that will end. Thank you for the reminder about signing my posts! Unfortunately, due to Wiki programming errors beyond my control, all of my posts are autosigned regardless! Zargabaath 18:00, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Fanboys

I've moved the page back to Fanboys (2009 film) - I'm assuming you moved it to Fanboys (2008 film), based on the idea that the SDCC screening was the premiere date - this is incorrect, as the 2008 screening was not an actual premiere, the actual release date, or indeed, the first screening, as screenings had taken place as early as 2007. Since the film didn't go into wide release until 2009, that should remain as the year in the title disambiguation. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't realize this was incorrect. What was up with the Comic-Con thing then? Did they just show a preview, not the whole film? BOVINEBOY2008 20:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

The Comic-Con screening was a private sneak preview, not part of the convention film festival. However, this was also not the first screening of the film, as it had been screened at another event in 2007 before the drama with the Weinsteins. However, I don't think that individual sneak previews of any kind should count towards any film's release date, otherwise we'd have to re-evaluate the "release date" for almost every major release of the last few years. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! BOVINEBOY2008 07:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Julian Fellowes

Well, that explanation makes sense. I think it's fair to say that your previous comment "no awards like this" was confusing to say the least. I'm not sure that the campaign is consistent with WP:LEAD, though. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't clear the first time. The whole goal of that task is to avoid the "award-winning" and variations of that in lede sentences because it gives little information, and often puts emphasis on one aspect of an individual and can even be seen as WP:PEACOCK. BOVINEBOY2008 21:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Falling Up.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Falling Up.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

MOS:Bold listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MOS:Bold. Since you had some involvement with the MOS:Bold redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 13:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Help

I would like more opinions on this AFD if you don't mind. − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 21:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

• News and notes: Wikipedia articles expert-reviewed by Encyclopedia of Life, and more

• In the news: Confusion about Wikileaks continues, Wikipedia vs. Britannica in India, and more

• Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: The community has spoken

• Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Vanessa Morgan /Film Christine Jeffs Brave (2012 film) LivePlanet Rachel Snow Skyler Shaye Nick Searcy 143 Records Rio (film) Gillian Jacobs Kyle Downes Mark Andrews (filmmaker) Vehicle restoration Poison (Alice Cooper song) Jackson Bond Kishin Line Keegan Gerhard Kim Jaewon

Cleanup Belle (Disney) Digital 3D List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon Merge Tennis records relating to aces Practical effect List of One Tree Hill episodes Add Sources Golden Globe Award for Best English-Language Foreign Film Vancouver Film Critics Circle Award for Best Supporting Actress List of Toy Story characters Wikify Jonathon Young (actor) Osric Chau Emanuel Kiriakou Expand Quinn Fabray 2002 Florida Gators softball season Sailor Mouth

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

• News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief

• In the news: Faulty story urges for advertising on Wikipedia; brief news

• Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland

• Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Majestic Titans

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for pointing out what was wrong with my edit on Tangled. I did not now about that guideline. ParalysedBeaver (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

No problem! BOVINEBOY2008 08:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Bzuk (talk) 14:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Higdon Revision

You asked for me to point you to other composers that list the Pulitzer prize in their opening lines. They include John Adams, Steven Stucky, Joseph Schwantner, Melinda Wagner, Ellen Taffe Zwilich, William Bolcom and Shulamit Ran, among others. Given that both the Grammy and Pulitzer awards and facts, I don't understand what the issue is with having them in the opening lines. Furthermore, these are more fully explained in the body of the text making the information sufficient.

Thank you,Lawdonpress (talk) 21:16, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Bovineboy2008, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Logan Talk Contributions 23:51, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

About Pokémon: Zoroark: Master of Illusions

Just to note that a release date has already been announced on the pokemon.com official website for the movie. So please bare in mind that when a release date has been announced, it stays on the article. Not to be removed in any way.

Thanks!(Platinum Lucario (talk) 04:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC))

Nomination of Sparrow (2010 film) for deletion

The article Sparrow (2010 film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparrow (2010 film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

• Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting

• News and notes: Director of Technical Operations hired; South Korean mayor sues; brief news

• In the news: Designing Wikipedia and the origin of page histories; brief news

• WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Humpty Dumpty Page

Hey, you made a few edits on my userspace page User:Knssilm/Humpty Dumpty (film). I didn't understand your edit summary "remove cats", and i did not understand your edits either. Would you mind elaborating for me? Thanks! Knssilm (talk) 03:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, should have explained better. Those categories (cats) are meant for main space articles. If your user space article does become main space, just restore the categories. BOVINEBOY2008 06:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks for the information. Knssilm (talk) 06:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)