Bongchillum
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Logo edit
The logo was deemed to be a copyright violation. Please do not reinstate it. - Sitush (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
How it is deemed as copyright violation. This is official logo from IAC website.
October 2014 edit
Your recent editing history at India Against Corruption shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 12:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
I"m not warring, so many other people are canceling my edit. it is they which are warring.
- Wikipedia works on the basis of consensus. When "so many other people are canceling my edit", you need to understand that you do not have consensus for that edit. You may, if you wish, begin a discussion in an attempt to obtain said consensus but in this instance you will fail because copyright is a serious matter and this infringed it. If I were you, I would steer well clear of articles relating to India Against Corruption for the time being. Oddly, you seem to have set up some edits specifically so you could change things there and, alas, that itself is not going to go down well given the amount of disruption that has been going on regarding that topic. - Sitush (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- I just uploaded nicer version of IAC logo which is approved by IAC 'to accompany substantive text describing India Against Corruption and its activities'
Your recent edits edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.