Bon Martin
July 2017
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Microwave auditory effect has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Microwave auditory effect was changed by Bon Martin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874749 on 2017-07-22T03:57:27+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
May 2018
edit Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Microwave auditory effect, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Discuss this on the article talk page and stop removing well sourced sections when multiple editors have reverted your change. Ravensfire (talk) 13:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Microwave auditory effect shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 03:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm not in an edit war, someone has declared an edit war on me. Big difference. If they have a particular reason to change my edit, I think they need to discuss that with me instead of taking it upon themselves to change it. Bon.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN talk to me 04:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Five different editors have disagreed with your changes. If you continue to make them without getting consensus your next block will be longer. --NeilN talk to me 04:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 12:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)