FMEP edit

Hello,

I noticed you've been adding links to FMEP, as a source for various points in several articles. I have two questions -

  1. Are you affiliated with this organization?
  2. Second, and more importantly - please review (if you haven't already) WP:RS, and explain why FMEP qualifies as a reliable source, fit for use in Wikipedia. Note I'm not saying it's not, in fact I know nothing about it. I do know there are a lot of organizations in this field, some more important and well-known, some less. We usually try to use academic sources (first and foremost, usually), official data (especially for statistics, like demographics, or economy), or very well-known, trusted organizations (UN agencies, for example). The notability and reliability of this particular organization must be established to allow its use here. Normally, a smaller non-profit organization is not an RS, but there may be exceptions.

Thanks, okedem (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AIV edit

Please do not report simple content disputes to AIV; as noted at the top of that page, it is for clear and persistant vandalism. If you are confused, please read WP:Vandalism. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 00:04, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard A. Falk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply