Welcome edit

Hello, Blueskymorning, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

A more personal welcome edit

Hello Blueskymorning! I see you already got the boilerplate welcome, but I thought I'd say that I'm glad to see a new user who dives right in to constructive editing. We can use more people like you around here. If you ever need anything, just drop a message on my talk page: I edit in rather unpredictable bursts but I use the wiki often enough for research that I'll notice any messages I get. -- LWG talk 06:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

          Thank you, I'm happy to be here. Blueskymorning (talk) 12:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Francis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clark County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve TeamSnap edit

Hi, I'm Jackson Peebles. Blueskymorning, thanks for creating TeamSnap!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. While this isn't exactly purely a list, it contains many different points that do not read like a typical article. Please consolidate into paragraph form, if possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jackson Peebles (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TeamSnap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Book club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Grayfell. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Qnet seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 00:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just about every big company has a charity operation. It is very rare that such PR efforts rise to the level of encyclopedic content, and Qnet does not seem to be one of those occasions. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

MonaVie 'huffpo" source isn't huffpo edit

Hi there,

On MonaVie the Huffington post "source" at citation 13: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/19/monavie-juice-pyramid-sch_n_651845.html

isn't actually Huffington Post. It's a redirect to a blog that has no editorial oversight whatsoever. The huffpo snippet is just a title scraper to the huffpo food blog. Please remove this citation. The accompanying scheme text is supported by the Forbes blogpost.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.7.162 (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion edit

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply