Blueman19

March 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Memo18 (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Response to Memo 18

This is not disruptive editing. This is legitimate editing. An individual place a person's name followed by "is a bitch" which is neither appropriate (in any context) or called for on this site.

With regard to the other two edits, I removed the section called "controversies" as they represented a person's desire to paint the school in a bad light. As a representative of the school, my reading of the rules is that I have the right to make these edits directly on the page. Just because someone posts something doesn't make it a fact or qualify it as a "controversy" and this appears to be a direct statement that was intended to paint the school in a bad light, on one hand, and just insulting in the case of naming a particular individual and saying she was a "bitch."

Please indicate why this is a problem. This does not qualify as "disruptive editing" as you have it defined below:

---

Disruptive editing is a pattern of edits, which may extend over a considerable period of time or number of articles, that has the effect of

   * disrupting progress toward improving an article, or
   * disrupting progress toward the fundamental project of building an encyclopedia.

Please note that disruptive editing is not usually considered vandalism, but vandalism can be disruptive. Each case should be treated independently, taking into consideration whether or not the actions violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines. In addition, if an editor treats situations which are not clearly vandalism as such, then that editor may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors.

---

As a representative of the school I have a right to correct "mis-information" about the school and as a human being I have the RESPONSIBILITY to remove offensive statements made about people that have no other impact that to hurt those people.

Please explain yourself. Blueman19 (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Explain why was not be deleted till now. OK? Memo^{talk with me} 19:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Convince administrators that should be deleted that text, and then reach a consensus. You can not delete the text of your head unless it is vandalism. Memo^{talk with me} 11:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)