Hi. The problem was, it did in fact read like vandalism at first blush. Give me a moment and I'll double-check it in the deletion log and get back to you. Hang on just a moment. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm back. It certainly wasn't vandalism (my sincerest apologies for that), but it gets fewer than 600 Google hits. It simply isn't notable enough a phenomenon for inclusion. Please don't be discouraged. Any and all good-faith attempts are welcomed, even if they're deleted. Thanks for understanding and thanks for being nice about this. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Anytime. You can respond within a prior section if you wish and always feel free to ask for help. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)