User talk:Blindfreddy84/Archive1
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 12:31, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This article currently describes the BoltWatch website as "Contrary discussion of Bolt's opinion pieces and fora". I think critical would be more grammatical and more accurate. I'm planning to tighten up the sentences about Webdiary in the near future; unless you object, I'll make this change as well.
or radical
editi think or radical was being used as an alternate description, rather than another word for left wing. everyone knows that there a radicals on both sides. Xtra 02:58, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Fair enough, (I will admit that I didn't know the initial meaning) although in the scheme of things the term now is a bit redundant. (i.e. 19th Century) it think now it has changed meaning. Much like the initial meaning of the word "conservatism".Blindfreddy84 11:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)