Blesingri

Welcome!

Hello, Blesingri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ancient greece propaganda, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Thebestofall007 (talk) 11:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ancient greece propaganda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ancient greece propaganda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thebestofall007 (talk) 11:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Socialist Republic of Macedonia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Hristo Tatarchev, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hristo Tatarchev. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

A newspaper clipping in a language that is unclear to readers of the English-language Wikipedia older then 100 years as reliable source!

User:Blesingri, per Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history), historical scholarship is generally not:

• Journalism
• Opinion pieces by non-scholars
• Popular works that were not reviewed, especially works by journalists, or memoirs—these may be useful to supplement an article that relies upon scholarly sources
• Any primary source, etc. Jingiby (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Blesingri, per Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history), to determine scholarly opinions about a historical topic, consult the following sources in order:

• Recent scholarly books and chapters on the historiography of the topic
• "Review Articles", or historiographical essays that explicitly discuss recent scholarship in an area.
• Similarly conference papers that were peer reviewed in full before publication that are field reviews or have as their central argument the historiography.
• Journal articles or peer reviewed conference papers that open with a review of the historiography. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I did not add any original research. Blesingri (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Very well, I will add references to my additions :) Blesingri (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Basically, Dobrin Michev was professor at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, which always received subsidies from the Bulgarian state. Otherwise, you are wrong about the MSI. The state started financing the "Macedonian Scientific Institute" (MSI) later. This non-governmental organization started receiving money from the budget in the year in which the VMRO party began to support the second government of Boyko Borisov (2014-2017). By the way, this funding, reported by "Free Europe", has caused a politica a scandal. Until 2014, there was no such funding, and Michev died in 2001. However this is not directly related to the issue with ASNOM's activity and the quorum of the first session, neither with the article about ASNOM itself. Do not coatrack articles. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 06:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)