Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in The Debarted, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. Ctjf83Talk 03:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bone

edit

Sorry for the undo earlier. Still, it doesn't seem official to me due to the wiggle room Krayzie gave himself. I'd like to see an official press release from the label and/or the group on their respective websites which would make it a bit more concrete. I won't revert it for the near future. Though, keep your edits encyclopedic. This is not meant to be a fansite (and I'm a big fan). All that aside, I hope they do reunite. Again, I apologize for the revert but people have been reuniting the group over and over again with no citation of sources and until the YouTube vid, there were none to back up the claim. Thanks. τßōиЄ2001 (ǂ ) 04:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Blackdragon6' understood...


edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:The Original Lineup (2110996788).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sasikiran (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:NewBTNH.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NewBTNH.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 00:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonepress.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bonepress.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:53, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply