January 2016 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cantley railway station has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Railway stations and style points edit

Hi. I just reworked your recent edit on Cantley railway station. Could you have a look at what I changed please and try to consider using this sort of style for your other edits (not exactly - we all write differently of course - but as a guide at least). In particular could you add a nav for the source you provide? A book title or whatever - preferably with publisher and date and place of publication. And note that one of the many things Wikipedia does slightly oddly is that we don't use th or st after numerals in dates - so today is 26 January, not 26th January. And please add wiki-links where appropriate (bit not too many...)

Others might disagree with me btw - there are lots of enthusiasts about stuff like this who like things done in specific ways. Hope you can see the sort of thing I mean - shout, either here or on my talk page if you need a hand. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be copypasting the same chunk of text into article after article, repeating the same mistakes over and over. Please look back through the earlier pages that you worked on, most of which have been subsequently edited by myself, Blue Square Thing and others - have a look at what we did. If you don't know why, just ask. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've just reverted an edit made to Buckenham station. The wording seemed to be a line history more than a history of the actual station. It also lacked wiki linking or proper referencing - it's not hard to learn how to do this. Can I strongly suggest that you engage us in some conversation here and maybe try a draft paragraph or two summarising the history as it related to Buckenham with referencing. We'll be glad to help, but at present you're not engaging at all which really doesn't help. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Bkendler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. In particular, please read MOS:DATE to see which forms of date are acceptable - for articles about UK railway topics, there's really only one style: day first (without initial zero), then a space, then the month written out in full, then another space, then the year with four digits. Don't use hyphens, don't abbreviate month names. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. In addition to that, when copying from one article to another, it is important to copy the page source and not the rendered text, in order that the references be copied correctly. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will you please read up how to make references. Putting a figure inside square brackets, as you did here does not work. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hethersett railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Big Four and Big Four. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Bkendler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Duplication of articles edit

If there is already an article on a subject, you can just expand it instead of making another one: for example Stephen Singleton (footballer) and Stephen Smith-Singleton. If you want to change the title you can move the article. If it won't let you because there's already an article by that name, you can make a move request. ... discospinster talk 19:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Billy Barbour) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Billy Barbour, Bkendler!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article on Billy Barbour. Thank you for your contribution.

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 14:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Burton (footballer, born 1863), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (J Scowcroft) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating J Scowcroft, Bkendler!

Wikipedia editor My name is not dave just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

All seems good here, but why is the DEFAULTSORT as John McLellan? This is not the player's name.

To reply, leave a comment on My name is not dave's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

!dave 21:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 2 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Harry Tyrer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to William Tait
Peter Bullough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lostock

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 9 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

James Parkinson (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to John Mitchell and Charlie Harrison
Jack Hibbert (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jack Holland
Sam Gillam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Charlie Harrison
Thomas Midgley (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Lawton
William Bury (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jack Gordon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 16 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Issac Monks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wilson
Jack Hibbert (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jack Holland

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve George Clifton footballer edit

Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Bkendler, thanks for creating George Clifton footballer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The title of the article does not comply with the guidelines. Should probably be moved to George_Clifton (football player) or similair like George_Clifton (footballer)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I moved the page to George Clifton (footballer), and will ask for the George Clifton footballer to be deleted. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 23 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Benjamin Spilsbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Alexander Higgins and Joseph Marshall
Thomas Needham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Joseph Marshall

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 30 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Costley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex McKinnon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 6 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Henry Parkinson (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Brown and George Farmer
Charles Jolliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alex McKinnon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Style of article title disambiguation edit

According to the guidelines, disambiguation terms in article titles should be in lower case, e.g. Alex McKinnon (footballer) instead of Alex McKinnon (Footballer). ... discospinster talk 18:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Waugh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Farmer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Date formatting edit

Thanks for all your recent contributions to Wikipedia. Please be aware that dates should be formatted "28 March 1894" not "28th March 1894" in order to comply with MOS:DATE. Cheers, Number 57 17:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Also, scorelines should be 2–1 not 2-1, and seasons 1888–89 not 1888-1889. Cheers, Number 57 17:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 20 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bob Jardine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Basford and Halliwell
Ted Harker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Plumtree

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harry Daft, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 15:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Harry Daft. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 18:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Charles Dobson. GiantSnowman 10:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 27 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bob Jardine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Basford and Halliwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GiantSnowman 10:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

You have been repeatedly adding unsourced or poorly sourced content to articles. You have been warned multiple times, but you continue to do this. Please review WP:RS and WP:V. GiantSnowman 10:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bkendler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Giant Snowman claims I use non-sourced material. When you look at his reversions he just puts the article back to limited meaningless information. He clearly has a prejudice against ENFA and the Metcalf book and the Dykes book. He should be blocked as an editor as he does not give reasons, is dictatorial and is out of line with other editors who do not mind my material. I believe this nameless person to be prejudiced and ignorant and unfair. GIVE ME REASONS my stuff is unsourced instead of acting like some latter-day Hitler.

Decline reason:

Block extended to indefinite, based on your abhorrent personal attacks. If you apologise and commit to abiding by WP:NPA, any admin is free to unblock you once your original 48 hour block expires. Yamla (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict) Quick comment for the reviewing admin - all you need to do it check this guy's edits, he adds mass of content to articles, the vast majority of which is unreferenced or poorly referenced. All I have done is remove the unreferenced information and try to clean up what was referenced (1, 2, 3). I warned him about this - he ignored and therefore was blocked. I'm not the first to warn him about this, check out a previous warning from 2 years ago... PS pleasantly surprised that Godwin's law has been proved so quickly! GiantSnowman 14:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Three points I apologise for any offence but the claim by GiantSnowman that I use unsourced material is unfair. I have taken basically one line articles about Victorian footballers and made them interesting by using three sources. One ENFA - The Soccer database for England & Wales; two Who' Who books well researched and written and Metcalf' book on the first season of the Football League. I will abide by WP rules but you are making it very difficult to improve articles and it seems editors can revert without giving the writer the chance to explain their source linking the material.

That's nowhere near sufficient. You compared another Wikipedia editor to Hitler. Step back, take whatever time you need to cool down (really! everyone needs this from time to time), and then read WP:NPA. Your personal attack is incompatible with you remaining a Wikipedia editor and you are being extended a last chance to show this was just a heat-of-the-moment thing, as happens to all of us. --Yamla (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Bkendler, please look at the edits I linked to above. You will clearly see me removing reams and reams of unsourced content that you added. If you can't understand that then you are not fit enough to edit Wikipedia. Adding heaps of unsourced content is not "improving" Wikipedia, it is making it worse. GiantSnowman 15:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dear GiantSnowman I used inappropriate language towards you and that was not right and I am sorry for that. I really am. I am caring for my 97 year old Mother at the moment and writing up football biographies as been a wonderful outlet for me as I have very little free time. The restrictions on my time make life difficult and makes me irascible. It's not an excuse. The language I used was wrong. I am very, very sorry. Can I in the spirit of goodwill take up one of the items you removed alleging I had no source. This was from Herbert Snook - Herbert Snook was born in the City of Nottingham on 23 December 1867. As he approached his 19th Birthday he played football for Trent College, Long Eaton in County Derbyshire. The ENFA website and the Garth Dykes both confirm that he played for Trent College. Therefore, with respect, why do you object to this material? BKendler

Not a problem - apology accepted. Regarding your content of "Herbert Snook was born in the City of Nottingham on 23 December 1867. As he approached his 19th Birthday he played football for Trent College, Long Eaton in County Derbyshire", it should be changed to simply 'Born in Nottingham, Snook played football for Trent College" and then directly cited to ENFA (using {{ENFA}}) and/or the Dykes book (including page number). Your referencing has been wholly inadequate I'm afraid. GiantSnowman 15:34, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Bkendler. I have shortened your block back down to the original 48 hour block. You are free to contest that, and your unblock request would likely be reviewed favourably if you and GiantSnowman are able to resolve the sourcing concerns, here, before you make your request. --Yamla (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I leave it up to you and Giant Snowman whether to lift the block now. Now GiantSnowman and I have discussed a sample of what the latter objects to I will endeavour to be more scrupulous at sourcing. In terms of page numbers I have not seen books used referring to pages. So take the Metcalf book. The normal reference is like this <ref>{{cite book|last=Metcalf|first=Mark|title=The Origins of the Football League|year=2013|publisher=Amberley|isbn=978 1 4456 1881 4}}</ref> Where do I insert page numbers please? BKendler

Simply <ref>{{cite book|last=Metcalf|first=Mark|title=The Origins of the Football League|year=2013|publisher=Amberley|isbn=978 1 4456 1881 4|page=NUMBER}}</ref>. My polite suggestion is that you thoroughly read WP:RS and WP:V and familiarise yourself with how we edit, and allow the block to naturally expire. GiantSnowman 15:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 18 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bob Howarth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Preston
James Trainer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Preston
Robert Holmes (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Preston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

These links are all correct. Linking to the town of Preston.

Bob Roberts (footballer, born 1859) edit

  Hello, I'm Jameboy. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Bob Roberts (footballer, born 1859), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You added additional information to existing content that is supported by specific citations, but I have checked the sources and in neither case does the source support what you have added, so it may be necessary to add additional references. Where did you get your information from? Jameboy (talk) 11:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Also please can you review what constitutes a minor edit. Adding content, even a small amount, is not minor. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 12:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Appreciate your comments. I do have a source and will add the comments with the source today or tomorrow. Really appreciate you clarifying minor/major edits. Thanks for your help. Barry K

League appearances edit

League appearances from all leagues belong in the player's infobox, whether they be in the Football League or in another league... Midland League, La Liga etc. Otherwise Lionel Messi would have 0 (0) in his box. Also if there is a statistics table that is referenced then you don't need to add references for the same stats in the infobox. Cheers.--EchetusXe 11:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi I understand your point but there is a serious lack of consistency and clarity of the English. The phrase at the bottom of the ( I am not sure what you call it - The Bio panel says the following, 'Senior club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only.' Now if you ask anybody what is the Domestic league in England especially back in Victorian times then it is The Football league. If you look at most Football Bio' that what's they count. So the point about Messi is spurious. He plays in La Liga so you would count that. But if he retired and played in ( I don't know Spanish minor Leagues) the Andalucia Regional League that would not count. So Domestic league = in England Football League, now Premier/Championship/EFL League. That is the way most of your colleagues interpret "Domestic league". The English dictionary explains that domestic means home or relating to the country. So, the Midland league is a regional league not a Domestic league. Now I have probably upset you but I am a pedant. So, with my holding of the breath I ask why did you remove the descriptions of Billy Rowley as a player. Again it is inconsistent and, in my humble opinion, brings a long dead hero of the past alive. If its just facts and figures it's a bit boring.

Disambiguation link notification for March 25 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Tunnicliffe (footballer, born 1864), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 1 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Wilson (footballer, born 1861), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Handsworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey edit

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 13 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alec Cannon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Albert Fletcher
Joe Cooper (footballer, born 1865) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Molineux

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Albert Fletcher (footballer, born 1867) edit

Please can you start directly citing material again? GiantSnowman 13:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 20 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Albert Fletcher (footballer, born 1867) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Molineux
Alec Cannon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Albert Fletcher

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Harry Wood (footballer) edit

I have reverted the date of birth to 26 June 1868. The sources I cited are far more reliable than Matthews, Joyce and ENFA, all of which will no doubt have copied from one to the other. Both englandfootballonline and the Southampton historians have researched these matters thoroughly. Free BMD only refers to the quarter in which the birth is registered and is therefore not helpful in fixing the precise date. Best wishes. 2A00:23C5:8D07:B000:E43B:C0FA:8B86:9070 (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC) p.s. Take a look at the bio on englandfootballonline which dismisses the older works of reference. 2A00:23C5:8D07:B000:E43B:C0FA:8B86:9070 (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fred Dewhurst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ireland national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 14 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy Ross (footballer, born 1866), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancashire Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 7 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Edwards (early footballer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Preston and Jack Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fred Poland edit

Hello, just a quick note regarding your edit on Fred Poland and my subsequent edit which rephrased or rearranged most of your text - please don't take it as an affront, because it's not intended in that way, but your style was not really on the right level for Wikipedia, as other people have already pointed out to you. It's fantastic that you're bringing past players to life with all this information about them, and I applaud that effort because you're doing an invaluable job - but look back up this page to when you were blocked, and the way you wrote your counter-arguments there.

That's the kind of formality that Wikipedia requires, by which I mean, do keep writing all the stuff from your books (and citing the sources!) but try this style instead. Sorry, I'm trying to think of an easy way of explaining it.

Maybe think of having a chat to your mates, and then writing an encyclopaedia - two different things, which you'd do in two different styles. So you might tell your mates that Fred Poland was part of a Burnley team that 'scored three-goals-or-more-in-a-League-match', but if you turned the book to a page called, 'Fred Poland', you'd write about Fred's personal achievements, without any emotional language. Not all facts-and-figures, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying - for example - that you'd tell your mate, 'oh, yeah, he came from Scotland to Lancashire 'cause he was looking for work', but in the book you'd write, 'Poland moved from Scotland to Lancashire to look for work'.

That's the style you're after, and as I mentioned, you used it very well in your discussions with GiantSnowman in February. Have a go at using it in your edits too, that's my only criticism - but please do carry on, because even if it needs reshaping a bit so it fits Wikipedia, your work is valued. Montgomery15 (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Bkendler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply