Seminar in Feminist Theory GIS-3614! Looking forward to editing some Wikipedia! BionicTwinkie (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Hey there! I am still a little fuzzy on how this all works but I am also looking forward to editing some Wikipedia!

Amuzzarelli (talk) 02:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I see you guys have also figured this out! Nice job on the talk page and comments. Can't wait to start contributing either! Good luck to you!

(talk)--Reed0310 (talk) 11:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review "Genderism"

edit

Hey, I just checked out your first edits on Genderism I think for the most part it was a good inclusion! It sounded clear and concise. It was definitely fine grammatically so no worries there! I made a very minor grammatical edit (fixed the apostrophe in one word) for you. What I would do, is go back and add some more information to your references. Here is the format I found recommended on Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia for citing Wikipedia articles (Plagiarism. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved August 10, 2004, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism[3])

Same thing for the outside sources you have. I followed the format of the other in-line citations I saw in my article when citing... which looked like this: [1] So basically you need to cite it just like you would for a paper- include all the normal info but with that format. My suggestion would be to look at the other in- text citations in the same article and follow their format plugging in your reference's information.

Good luck with your continued edits! Hope this helped! Alicia Pileggi (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ John Doe (2014). "Example". Example Publishing. Retrieved November 1, 2014.