November 2015 edit

  Hello, Billynumnum. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
  • instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies.

Also, please be aware that using Wikipedia for promotion or publicity is contrary to Wikipedia policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion or advertising of any sort, and editors who use Wikipedia for promotion may be blocked from editing. Apart from a few edits about a retired squash player which you made in 2013, all of your editing (most of which has been deleted) has consisted of attempts to use Wikipedia for advertising. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Billynumnum. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sehat.com.pk, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
  • instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sehat.com.pk for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sehat.com.pk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sehat.com.pk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

M4DU7 (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)Reply