Wikipedia

BillyKeys

Joined 1 December 2009
Latest comment: 3 years ago by BigrTex in topic Proposed deletion of File:Johnmblack.jpg
Learn more about this page

Hi all wikepedians, I like to write mainly about stuff in Townsville like about famous people that lived or still live in townsville, that don't have wikepedia pages yet.

Proposed deletion of Townsville T&G Building

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Townsville T&G Building has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Goldsugarshaker.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading File:Goldsugarshaker.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:T&gclock71.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading File:T&gclock71.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Russelcrocs.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Russelcrocs.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Russelcrocs.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)(Talk) 13:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:T&gclockdemolishment.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading File:T&gclockdemolishment.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:T&gclock07.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading File:T&gclock07.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Altheastranddamage.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.townsville.nu/images/strandafteralthea.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Altheastranddamage.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Altheastranddamage.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 12:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Slimdusty.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.abc.net.au/snc/stories/s920353.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Slimdusty.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Slimdusty.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Slimdusty.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Slimdusty.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Slimdusty.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 12:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:T&gclock71.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/glenhsparky/4132506649/. As a copyright violation, File:T&gclock71.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:T&gclock71.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 12:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:T&gclock07.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=227256. As a copyright violation, File:T&gclock07.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:T&gclock07.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 12:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://home.brisnet.org.au/~dunn/locations/buchananshotel.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Earlyphotohotel.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, John Melton Black, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.townsville.qld.gov.au/townsville/heritage/heritage_chronology. As a copyright violation, John Melton Black appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. John Melton Black has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:John Melton Black and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:John Melton Black with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:John Melton Black.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 15:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Madearth

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A tag has been placed on Madearth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Zvn (talk) 15:53, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to No. 3 Fighter Sector RAAF, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Saintfiguretownsville.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/09/27/16482_news.html. As a copyright violation, File:Saintfiguretownsville.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Saintfiguretownsville.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Saint, Townsville, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/09/27/16482_news.html. As a copyright violation, The Saint, Townsville appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Saint, Townsville has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 17:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia. You can not take information created by other people and claim it as your own. If you continue to do this you will be blocked from editing. --AussieLegend (talk) 17:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Holiday Inn, Townsville

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Holiday Inn, Townsville. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holiday Inn, Townsville. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 (cont.)

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

  Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to No. 3 Fighter Sector RAAF, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Buchanan Hotel, Townsville. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Final Warning

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

PLEASE NOTE: You have been reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. The next instance of any vandalism (uploading copyright images, removal of templates, etc) will see this account blocked indefinitely.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please also read the policies in the standard welcome menu (Added below)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello, BillyKeys! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:33, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of Kidtopian Glancsess (Kidtopia Beast)

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kidtopian Glancsess (Kidtopia Beast), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kidtopian Glancsess (Kidtopia Beast). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Momo san Gespräch 15:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of North Queensland.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of North Queensland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruptive editing after warnings. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keys43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. AussieLegend (talk) 11:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of North Queensland.svg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of North Queensland.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:T&gclocktwnsvlle.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A tag has been placed on File:T&gclocktwnsvlle.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 03:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Quarantinebuilding.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A tag has been placed on File:Quarantinebuilding.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 03:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Quarantinestationtownsville.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A tag has been placed on File:Quarantinestationtownsville.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -- Alexf(talk) 03:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Johnblack1850.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thank you for uploading File:Johnblack1850.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Johnmblack.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thank you for uploading File:Johnmblack.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Johnmblack.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The file File:Johnmblack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image with no evidence of use. A better quality (clearer, higher resolution) version of what appears to be the same image is already on Commons and in use and has better source information: File:JohnMeltonBlack.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 19:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BillyKeys&oldid=1142892487"