User talk:BillC/Awards
Barnstar
edit
BillC,
Thanks for finishing up the Red Links Project! For your dedication, I award you the Working Man's Barnstar. Use it only for good, and never for evil. Thanks again! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 12:58, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
|
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
| For putting up with my FA review, and for his massive contributions to Venus, I award BillC the E=mc² barnstar. Hope to be joining him in his updates as soon as Europa's FAC is finished. Serendipodous 02:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC) |
Having checked the warfare section for our Featured Articles I have determined that you have succsessfully promoted the 1st Royal Navy ship to FA status. For that, I herby award you the WikiChevrons. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 07:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| For a timely expansion of the Thomas Wakeman article, which helped it get to DYK. Truthanado (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
Featured Picture
edit |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Transformer3d col3.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~~~~
|
Congratulations, and thankyou for making it for us. It is a great diagram. Raven4x4x 06:15, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:PowerStation3.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
|
Congratulations, and thanks for nominating it. I've added a link to Image:PowerStation2.svg in the image description page incase a version without an integrated key is prefered (for other languages etc.). Since the other two versions (Image:Power Station with key.svg and Image:PowerStation.svg) are not being used in any articles, would it be OK if I deleted them as redundant images? Raven4x4x 08:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, never mind. I just realised that they were on commons, and I'm not a commons admin. In reply to your question, from what I know we generally leave old versions in the history. I've never seen a page that says we shouldn't. Raven4x4x 08:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)