Bigoasis

Film genres

Regarding your edits at Paper Towns (film), The Fault in Our Stars (film), and Turtles All the Way Down (film), please see MOS:FILMGENRE, which states that the lead sentence should include "the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified." Long lists of genres are discouraged by a majority of editors and the MOS, such that "romantic drama mystery film", " coming-of-age romance drama film", and especially the far, far too long "coming-of-age romantic comedy-drama mystery film" are trimmed down. It could be fine to have a sentence later in the lead that states the film contains elements of X, Y, or Z genre, as long as you have Reliable Sources backing up your claims. I would encourage you to restore my edits or take a crack on your own at trying to reduce the lead sentence clutter. Thanks for the other improvements you have made to the articles! Cerebral726 (talk) 20:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigoasis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. Sorry for the several edits. I just don't read all at once and keep making edits as a read and see the errors. This won't happen again. Bigoasis (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You gotta be kidding me given all your block evasion. As a site-banned editor, you shouldn't even have talk page access. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You're still evading your block as of at the time I'm writing this. Your only option is the standard offer and it needs to be made via your master account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)