BigJackman

Speedy deletion nomination of Limo Ride

Hello BigJackman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Limo Ride for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, NatalieBateman (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:BigJackman/Limo Ride has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Limo Ride, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Limo Ride.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:24, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

BigJackman, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BigJackman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Limo Ride

You asked me about this on my January talk page archive, but that's where I put questions I've dealt with. In the future, just use my main talk page.

Articles about films need to be based -- as all articles -- on good third party independent sources, which means magazine or newspaper article that have reviewed the film in a substantial way. They need to talk about more than plot: the production, a summary of the plot including the ending to the story-- WP never uses teasers, a list of the principle characters and the actors portraying them, with links to pages about the actors, a discussion of the reception of the film based on the reviews. As part of that, you can discuss the general meanings and intentions of the films, based on sources. We make the assumption that material with an incomplete plot and praising the film submitted before release is intended to promote the film.

The plot can be taken from the film itself, but not from IMDB, because Imdb almost never discloses the ending; the list of actors can be taken from IMdB which is reliable for such information, but the reviews and the discussion must be based on independent writers. You cannot make claims about the importance of the film unless responsible critics have made them in published material from reliable non-self-published sources.

Except for the most major of films, that are discussed in good sources such as Variety during the production stage, it is not likely that these sources will be available until the film has been actually released.

As an exception, films made by a famous director -- or sometimes with very famous actors--will be included even without 3rd party reviews on the basis that such will certainly be forthcoming, but they still need to be added eventually.

When you have the proper material, just start the article again. Until you have it, there is no point. DGG ( talk ) 22:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Limo Ride concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Limo Ride, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eden Center may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{building

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Dragon's Crown

I appreciate your efforts for the Dragon's Crown article. I think there's not much point in restoring that last paragraph anymore; from the looks of things, it will probably never be properly cited by a reliable source. I've had a look around regarding the reason behind the blacklist, and apparently Wikipedia has had numerous issues with that website in the past, which is why it is blacklisted. The chance of that website's blacklist being lifted, or a whitelisting for that one URL, is very slim (if not impossible), people have made similar requests in the past, with all cases being declined. Since that information doesn't seem to be present in any other source, I think I've given up on it. --benlisquare_T•C•E 05:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Eden Center Interior.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eden Center Interior.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

3RR notice

Your recent editing history at Dragon's Crown (video game) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. KrakatoaKatie 15:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)