Biaswatch
April 2017 edit
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Wikipedia talk:Child protection for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. ChamithN (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Blocked edit
I have blocked this account because you are not here to build the encyclopedia. Your edits are entirely aimed at changing Wikipedia:Child protection policy wording to water it down or discussing how it is biased. Your username is "Biaswatch". All of this makes it plain your purpose here is to argue Wikipedia:Child protection policy is biased against pedophiles and this is not a tenable position, particularly for a brand new single-purpose account. Fences&Windows 00:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fences and windows, I disagree. Biaswatch is clearly here to build an encyclopedia, all they did was discuss a policy. Policies are an integral part of Wikipedia, so blocking a user for discussing policy is very unfair. —Beautiful Pony (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)