Bhola

Warning

You have been found vandalizing Wikipedia articles, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create a real account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

--Bhadani 08:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Bhola, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Falphin 8 July 2005 19:23 (UTC)

Hello. It appears you tried to fork the article on the Rajput page, which is not in keeping with it's needs (believe me there has beena massive issue with this page.) Please feel free to tidy this page up on unencyclopedic language but do not do any massive changes for reasons above.

Also you gave some references of numbers of Rajputs in Pakistan, can this be corroborated statistically for the article? Some wording you have used is quite descriptive and well put in places, can you contribute it on the Muslim Rajput page?

Many thanks for your efforts which at least we can see aren't prejudiced by communal agendas. --Raja 22:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Punjabi Agglutinative

Hi,

I see you have removed the statement that Punjabi is agglutinative in Punjabi language. Maybe a clarification is in order? In "Punjabi: A Cognitive-Descriptive Grammar", Tej Bhatia states:

"From the viewpoint of morphological complexity, Punjabi can be classified as an agglutinating language."

Some examples he lists:

ਪਰਦਾਦੀ [pardādī] = ਪਰ (Great) + ਦਾਦੀ (Grandmother) = Great Grandmother ਸਰਬੰਸ [sarbans] = ਸਰ (Whole) + ਬੰਸ (Family) = Whole family

Plus countless more. I invite you to discuss this on the Punjabi language talk page. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 00:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Rajput article

Hi Bhola. I have put up my views on the talkpage, but can I ask for some understanding and patience with this issue? It's clear that the Rajasthanis have never heard of us, or clearly dont want to believe in our heritage since our conversion (fair play to them as Rajasthani's were never respected at all by our Punjabi communities either,lol) but I implore you to respect ImpuMozhi's work as he is actually an excellent writer. If there's something you dont agree with him about, discuss it with him. He is very reasonable and has stuck up for us a number of times against the extremists. Dr Gorkhali (if he is one....; ) )is a certifiable POV machine (his denial is laughable as he's clearly not the authority he thinks he is), but after the abuse ImpuMozhi received and yet he still stuck it out in favour of the truth clearly indicates his good faith. Can I ask you to respectfully work with him? he has great lingual skills in regards to neutrality and encyclopedic language. Do you agree? --Raja 12:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

History of Pakistan

I saw your edits to History of Pakistan, and the sarcastic edit summary accompanying to this – please remember, editing wikipedia is a privilege and not a right. I find that you registered on 8th July 2005, and have less than 100 edits. That is fine. Please continue to contribute, and please avoid playing with wikipedia. Thank you. --Bhadani 13:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Please read all the policies of wikipedia, and also this page: User:Raul654/Raul's laws. --Bhadani 13:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Please avoid lowering the credibility of wikipedia. --Bhadani 15:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I do not feel that by restricting your edits to hardly 10 pages in 10 months you have understood the NPOV. You are a "troll" to use a simple world. --Bhadani 15:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The ideal Wikipedian

Copied from the user page of SlimVirgin:

1. Be nice. Praise people when you see things being done well. Write personal notes to people on their talk pages saying what a good edit such-and-such was. You can make someone's day with some positive feedback.
2. Don't engage in unnecessary personal criticism or personal attacks. At the same time, let people know that you're able and willing to stand up for yourself and your edits, but not to the point of being obnoxious.
3. Try to be reasonable. If you establish a reputation as a reasonable editor, people will forgive you almost any other quirk. Try not to get on your high horse over an issue. Don't become a single-issue editor. And when you see that an argument has gone decisively against you, walk away no matter how annoyed you are. Never disrupt Wikipedia to make a point.
4. Read Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability (policies), Wikipedia:Reliable sources (guideline), and Wikipedia:Cite sources (style guide), and stick to them even when it's killing you.
5. Vote for responsible people to become administrators, even if you disagree with them politically.
6. Vote for articles that are going through the featured-article process. Read them carefully, make constructive suggestions, and give praise where it's due, because it really is harder than it looks to get an article through that peer review.
7. Try to steer an article that you've written to featured-article status. It's hard work, but it will establish you as a serious editor.
8. Don't criticize admins unduly and don't jump on admin-attack bandwagons. It's easy to make mistakes as an admin, so be generous in your dealings with them. You'll usually find that they, in turn, will be generous in their dealings with you.
9. Try to avoid revert wars. Never violate 3RR. Be self-limiting in how many times you revert a page in a day. Try to get consensus on talk before reverting. If you do revert without prior discussion, explain why on talk.
10. Contribute well-researched, well-referenced content, no matter how humble, to the encyclopedia, and discuss your edits on talk pages. Don't spend all your time on talk, but don't closet yourself away in the encyclopedia either. This is a community. Be part of it.

--Bhadani 15:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Please also avoid Edit war. I understand that you do not understand the wiki-spirit. Please do something constructive here. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ImpuMozhi (talk • contribs)

---

You have been vandalizing Wikipedia articles, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create a real account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

--Bhadani 08:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Tags

I was referring to the excessive use of {{fact}} templates - using too many has been viewed by senior administrators as violations of WP:POINT. If you think a large part of an article is unsourced, you should use {{unreferenced}} at the head of the article, the references section of the article or at the talk page. I'm sorry I may have come down on you like that, especially considering that you are rather new. Edwy ^(talk) 20:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not an administrator. If you want my opinion, you should make a list of what you think should be deleted (or temporarily place the fact templates), quote the policy, and ask for sources. If none are presented (within reasonable time - ie a few days if no one responds) then feel free to delete it. Deleting large chunks of text without explaining why first can come as a bit of a shock to other people and while it's not prohibited, it is considered more polite, especially if you know that the move is going to be controversial. If you need help or advice, you can go to the help desk or the administrators' noticeboard. The general rule is that you can do whatever you want, just be aware that you are likely to be reverted when making a controversial move if you haven't explained yourself in advance. Edwy ^(talk) 21:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

He is rather new, but more mature than several old ones. He knows to subvert the system. --Bhadani 09:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Rajput

I am sorry, I cannot look into the case in detail now. It is possible that you were treated unfairly, I didn't check. But your edits at present are not constructive, you try to change all sorts of things, at once. Try to build a hierarchical list of concerns you want to see addressed, and which statements in particular you find dubitable. Ask for citations for statements that you think will actually be untenable. If you summarily ask for citations for statements that are totally uncontroversial and treated in any of the books listed in the references, you are just tiring people's indulgence. We worked very hard to get the article into its present half-stable state. Yes, it still needs massive improvement, but that will only be possible step by step. dab (ᛏ) 17:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Have cake!

I saw you message to Dab, and I see the list of things I have called you: "such as calling me "unsavoury", "insufferable", "running amok", "trollish", "a troll", and maledicting me with "a pox" on my house". Put together in one sentence, it makes for a formidable list, thats a lot of words, and I can see why you are hurt. The various aggravations that elicited these epithets may also make for a long list, but how am I better, if I cannot display more restraint? Also, you may not believe it, but there is only one other person I have ever called a troll, this is not my usual style at all. I would like to extend an apology for these words. Please accept that, and also the ice-cream! Regards, ImpuMozhi 17:06, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Caring

I am waiting for you to come from your hibernation. It is always good to care for others and give a translation in English of the contents palced on your user page. --Bhadani 10:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Invitation

I invite you cordially to participate in the Band Baja Do event on my talk page. Please come there and enlighten and enliven the show. Thanks. --Bhadani 08:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bhadani#BAND_BAJO_DO

Thank you

Hi,

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bhadani#BAND_BAJO_DO

• • Kindly note: In view of the mental stress under which one of the invitees is presumed to be under, I have decided to indefinitely postpone the event named Band Baja Do. Thank you!
  • The next event to be organized shall be “Adhajal Gagari Chalakat Jaye”” (a proverb of Hindustan, meaning that the half-filled pot spills more fluid) that is, Empty vessel sounds much!! [1]. The time and venue shall be notified in due course. Thank you.

Regards. --Bhadani 13:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC) --Bhadani 13:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Are you there

So you have done no edit from so many days. Are you OK? Or, you come to edit only particular pages? --Bhadani 09:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Where are you? I shall be happy to see your nice edits. In case, you have some problem, I am with you. --Bhadani 16:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

request for comment

please see Pakistan Studies and see the talkpage to participte in discussion.Thankyou.-Vmrgrsergr 20:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)