If you want say me some question, I will send me a message in my talk in Catalan wikipedia.


Edit summaries

edit

Hi Beusson. When you are adding interwiki links, as you recently did to 1969 Spanish Grand Prix, would it be possible for you to add an edit summary indicating the change you have made? It means that people like me who are watching the page don't actually have to examine the diff to see what the change was. The edit summary doesn't need to be very long - just "iw" would be enough. Thanks, DH85868993 22:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, that's great! DH85868993 09:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Huggle

edit

Can you give me the rollback flag to use in huggle, please?--Beusson (talk) 16:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lady Fame says thanks!

edit
  Teylers Challenge star contributor
A message of thanks from Lady Fame of the Teylers Museum of Haarlem for participating in the Teylers Writing Challenge. The Museum values your contribution. You're the best!

Gjjanse (talk) 12:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oleguer Presas - Respuesta

edit

Hola desde Portugal,

si ya lo sé, lo había repuesto pero después lo quité, una inocentada, ahora parece que el artículo ya está en lo correcto.

Salutaciós, no problem about the English, you have to try always :) - --AL (talk) 17:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Beusson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Beusson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beusson (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 151.237.210.54. Place any further information here. Beusson (talk) 15:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That IP address belongs to servihosting. Please disable your proxy/vpn and wait 24 hours and then you should be able to edit. Yamla (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cross-wiki spam reversions

edit

Apologies for contacting you here, I couldn't find the unblock procedure on ca.wp where you've blocked me. I'm an admin on this wiki.

The tactics of these cross-wiki spammers is they insert about 4kB of legitimate looking text to disguise their spam reference. There's at least 150 accounts doing the same thing on multiple wikis with what appears to be automatically generated usernames, nearly all locked as spam-only (the ones that haven't I discovered this morning). They've been doing this for at least a year. The content is not trustworthy (1) because of the systematic abuse and (2) it is often supported by content marketing blogs typically for SEO purposes. See m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#alpha-performance.com_etc. for the list and m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2023/Bulk text reference addition spam for older spam. MER-C 10:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply