Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re: have i done okay in editing? edit

 
Hello, Betrayerofhope. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Marchjuly (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Umar edit

Dear User:Betrayerofhope, assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. I hope you are well. Why have you reverted edits that clearly improve the flow, readability and reliability of the article? I've carefully made many small edits to this page in recent days because it was, in my assessment, clumsily written, repetitive, hyperbolic and poorly referenced. I have tried to tighten the prose and remove repetition and to remove exaggerated claims based on weak sources. Where no sources support claims, I've added "citation needed" tags. In particular, I follow the verifiability and neutral point of view guidelines. If you disagree with my approach, please bring your thoughts to the Umar talk page for discussion. I'm happy to work with you and other editors. But right now you seem to be close to edit warring. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your edits on the Abu Bakr page edit

Hello Betrayerofhope, I see you and George cluster are doing a lot of work on the Umar page. I hope you guys can work productively together. Now, the reason I came here is, I wanted to thank you for your work on the Abu Bakr page. The page needs to be more NPOV and your addition of Ibn Kathir's al-bidaya wa-nihaya was an impressive balancing act. Please continue the good work. Mbcap (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Umar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{quote|Muhammad is but a messenger; messengers (the like of whom) have passed away before him. If,
  • {{quote|Umar judged the outcome of the Saqifa assembly to be a falta [translated by Madelung as 'a precipitate and ill-considered deal'&nbsp;<ref>Madelung, 1997. p.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to History of the Quran, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 00:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply