Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Stockach, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seydewitz (January 18)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 11:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Berelifeobro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 11:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buol-Berenberg (January 18)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 11:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnim-Boitzenburg (January 18)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome here! CactiStaccingCrane 12:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:Arnim-Boitzenburg while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 21:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gustav von Goßler has been accepted

edit
 
Gustav von Goßler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolf von Buol-Berenberg (March 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
141Pr {contribs/Best page} 13:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Buol-Berenberg

edit

  Hello, Berelifeobro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Buol-Berenberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply