October 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Naoum Shebib, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 11:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Official government sources

edit

Regarding Naoum Shebib content deletion; the sources do contain official government confirmation from Israel and Egypt. There is also confirmation from the researcher, Dr. Nirvana, who did a study on him and the systematic abstraction to which the Jews were subjected.[1]

Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ newsbeezer.com/uaeeng/whoever-yathir-in-a-kuwaiti-neighborhood-the-jews-in-the-geography-of-the-arab-world-are-emergencies-or-original/

The sources do not contain any government sources from Egypt. They contain a tweet from the Israeli government -- Shebib has never resided in Israel, nor is a tweet without a document to back the claim a valid source. Dr. Nirvana's source is a book by Omar Taher -- this book also does not state its sources. I have contacted multiple relatives of Shebib and they have all affirmed that he is Greek-Catholic. Why is a tweet without source, and a book without source more valid than the man's literal children and grandchildren? Beologi (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beologi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have never used multiple accounts. Please provide evidence of this. If this is in regards to the Naoum Shebib page, Vincion and I are relatives, but separate persons. Beologi (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are welcome to make a new unblock request once you review WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vincion is literally the grandson of Naoum Shebib. I did not recruit him/tell him to edit the Wikipedia page, I told him about it and he edited it himself without informing me about it or asking for my permission beforehand or being influenced by me in any way. To my knowledge, I have no ties with CaiMel -- if they are a relative of Shebib, I have not been informed of this and I certainly did not recruit them to edit the page. Beologi (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Beologi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have reviewed WP:MEAT. I apologise if this was interpreted as meatpuppetry, however I did not instruct Vincion to edit the Wikipedia page -- he did this of his own accord -- and I do not know CaiMel. If unblocked, I will refrain from editing the Naoum Shebib page until I have a published source to back my claim, and a consensus has been reached in the Discussion page. I will notify Vincion that he should do the same, but CaiMel is not a person I know nor have any contact with. Beologi (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC) Reply

Accept reason:

Welcome back; Special:Diff/1119277340 and the proposed approach look fine to me. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'd be fine with any checkuser unblocking any of the accounts. The revision history leading to the block can be found at [1]. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Beologi (talk) 05:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply