User talk:Bensin/Archives/2017

El Paquete Semanal

Hello. I understand the need to put any reference about this afirmation, but the true is that there are few information about this topic because is a underground manifestation. To put a exact year is a mistake, only is know it that it began at the end of the last decade or at the begining of the present. I think that 2008 is the more exact, but my decision was influenced by the information put in the Spanish Wikipedia, where there are a reference that I can′t to access. I´m only sure that 2014 is not correct, and many cubans than live in the island know it. I will wait your answer, and sorry for have not a solution for now for this problem. Why you not try with the reference put in the Spanish Wikipedia than I can′t to access because my internet is limited? Bye, good luck and answer me Al-Baco (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

@Al-Baco: Excellent source! Thank you! I made this edit. Keep up the good work! --Bensin (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Corregidor (1943) and Seven Were Saved

I did some work here on articles you created. Take a look. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bzuk: Nice! Good job on both articles. I made some minor edits in both articles and added some suggestions on to do templates on the talk pages. --Bensin (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:The 99 has been nominated for discussion

Category:The 99, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for the info. --Bensin (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Dolly Parton Photo Permission Request from Zumic

Hi,

I hope this message finds you having a good day.

My name is Jacob Grossfeld and I am the managing editor for Zumic, a music news website.

I'm writing to you because we discovered your photo of Dolly Parton (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dolly_Parton_accepting_Liseberg_Applause_Award_2010_portrait.jpg) online with a Creative Commons license, and we would appreciate your written permission to use it on our website, as well as your preferred attribution credit and any other specifications you might require.

A little background about Zumic: We cover all styles of music, giving artists and fans the respect they deserve. The name Zumic comes from our goal of "Music that revolves around you." Our philosophy champions a true appreciation for musicianship. We celebrate artists and make their work more accessible to people who will enjoy it. We truly believe that music has the power to educate, heal, and bring people together.

If you would like to request more information about Zumic, please do not hesitate to inquire.

Best regards, Jacob Grossfeld jacob (at) zumic.com Jgrossfeld2 (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Answered user here: User_talk:Jgrossfeld2. --Bensin (talk) 20:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Feeling bad for making things difficult

Hello, writing you here instead of the Swedish wikipedia where I'm being blocked (as you might know). I find your arguments on NI sound (not surprisingly since I made the same arguments myself). The stance taken by several people there seems to me to be completely absurd. They appear to completely ignore any evidence in favour of their a priori assumption. Not to mention how unsuitable the opinions on NI is in an article about a living person. As far as I can tell it violates many of the rules set out here: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Artiklar_om_nu_levande_personer

However seeing how inconsistent their stance is regards to facts in general, I guess it's disappointing but not surprising.

Anyway, me arguing my case apparently *really* rubbed everyone the wrong way, possibly making it even harder for you to make your case. So for that I'd like to apologize. Hmc1282171021 (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

No need to apologize. I assume that my arguments are evaluated on their own merit. --Bensin (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bensin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aron Flam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transcendence and Brendan O'Neill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

OK. --Bensin (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)