User talk:Bensin/Archives/2016
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fissure of the nipple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nipple shield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Intentional. No link at the disambig page fit. --Bensin (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hör den Kindern einfach zu
The article Hör den Kindern einfach zu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. I added a source and polished a little. --Bensin (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cat bell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Bensin (talk) 17:36, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeffrey O'Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tusk (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- War as metaphor
- added links pointing to The War Within and David Leigh
- Bo Johan Renck
- added a link pointing to Here We Go
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- The first was intentional. The second one is now fixed. --Bensin (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Lying (position)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Lying (position)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Aucassin (talk) 12:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see no Merge tag on the article. BMK (talk) 21:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- If you copied material from Decubitus then for copyright purposes you must add the "copied" template to both article. BMK (talk) 21:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, BMK (talk) 15:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: I made three changes in one edit: 1) Add link to Cross-gender acting 2) Add link to Womanless wedding 3) Changed formatting to use template "Div col" instead of "col-begin"/"col-break". Are you opposing all three of these changes? --Bensin (talk) 17:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- "Cross-gender acting" is acceptable.
"Womanless wedding" is, for all intents and purposes, meaningless and should be deleted.The column formatting is better the way it was. BMK (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)- Strike that about "womanless wedding", my mistake, I didn't realize it was referring to an historical type of event. If there's an alternate name for it, though, it would be better, because prima facie it seems like just another way of saying "gale male marriage". So the upshot is, it's only the formatting of the columns I object to. BMK (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: Great! I made another edit re-adding links to Cross-gender acting and Womanless wedding and keeping the formatting of the columns the way you like it. --Bensin (talk) 23:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good, thanks. When I get back home from where I am, I'd like to research the "womanless wedding" concept more - it's fascinating. BMK (talk) 13:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: Great! I made another edit re-adding links to Cross-gender acting and Womanless wedding and keeping the formatting of the columns the way you like it. --Bensin (talk) 23:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Strike that about "womanless wedding", my mistake, I didn't realize it was referring to an historical type of event. If there's an alternate name for it, though, it would be better, because prima facie it seems like just another way of saying "gale male marriage". So the upshot is, it's only the formatting of the columns I object to. BMK (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- "Cross-gender acting" is acceptable.
Commons
Please take a look at your commons account. I have left you a small request. Much appreciated.BabbaQ (talk) 23:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay. I answered there. --Bensin (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Looky Looky
Hello, Bensin,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Looky Looky should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looky Looky .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Xx236 (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks for the information. --Bensin (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Crazy People (Herreys album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crazy People (Herreys album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy People (Herreys album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 15:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- OK thanks. Article is updated and I voted keep. --Bensin (talk) 16:33, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spit hood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Bensin (talk) 18:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Kinnda
The article Kinnda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable songerwriter, fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPOSER
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheKaphox T 22:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted prop template and motivated in summary. --Bensin (talk) 18:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add reliable sources. gold disc - where? In Italy? You haven't even copied available informations.Xx236 (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hello! If you find that information, please add it to the article. --Bensin (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bensin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- @MediaWiki message delivery: Unsubscribe me. --Bensin (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)