Bengaloorugirl

I am from the IT capital of India, Bangalore. I like Wikipedia for its information.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wardy IT Solutions (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wardy IT Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wardy IT Solutions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Bengaloorugirl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your question

Hi! The problem is that every Wikipedia article must pass its notability guidelines to ensure that it is significant enough a subject to be on Wikipedia. In practice, this means that it must have significant coverage in reliable sources that is independent of the subject. This means, for example, that a media release - which most of the sources in the article were - does not count as a reliable source. An example of the sort of coverage needed would be newspaper articles about the subject.

The problem in the case of Wardy IT solutions is that it seems that there simply isn't enough coverage of the company out there to establish notability. The only source that I can see that (either in the article currently or in Google) might be the sort of coverage we require is the CRN article about the voluntary administration - but there would need to be quite a lot more of (at a minimum) that quality of coverage. Unfortunately, not every subject is not notable enough for Wikipedia, and I just don't see any way that they establish notability at the present time. Sorry to disappoint! The Drover's Wife (talk) 16:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wardy IT Solutions (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caorongjin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wardy IT Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wardy IT Solutions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caorongjin (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Wardy It Solutions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wardy It Solutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wardy It Solutions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 04:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 05:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)