BenCaesar

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bob Lynch (comics) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bob Lynch (comics) was changed by BenCaesar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919198 on 2015-02-22T13:33:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Reverting Proposed deletions

Once a proposed deletion has been removed you are not permitted to propose it again. You have been warned about this by another user and I posted a link to the WP policy. If you do that again you will be blocked from editing. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 16:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 21:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Your recent editing history at Bob Lynch (comics) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Other account?

Have you edited, or are you now editing, under a different user name or IP address? Thanks. --Epeefleche (talk) 02:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for this threat to create socks, "If you try to get me blocked, i will just create another account and deal with you". That's completely unacceptable, as is your other rudeness to Safiel. (And no, Safiel hasn't "tried to get you blocked": another admin noticed what was going on and posted at WP:AN, per above). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 14:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for unacceptable harassment of another editor and threats of sockpuppetry.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)