Nomination of Eric B. Hughes for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric B. Hughes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric B. Hughes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

why delete it, what's your point? Google E.B. Hughes. He's an award-winning filmmaker with 3 projects in the can. Why not improve the article?Bellatarr (talk) 20:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Bellatarr. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 00:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply
And I've replied to your reply. —C.Fred (talk) 23:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Fred, just got it. Yes, please put the article in a place where I can work on it. I could also use the help of Mark, as he had offered. Thanks again. Bellatarr (talk) 00:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric B. Hughes. It's flagged as a draft and not yet ready for review. —C.Fred (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric B. Hughes concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric B. Hughes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Eric B. Hughes edit

 

Hello Bellatarr. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Eric B. Hughes.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric B. Hughes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anna Rezan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anna Rezan was changed by Bellatarr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902069 on 2015-11-02T07:47:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not blank pages, as you did to Anna Rezan with this edit, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 07:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

delete this page. It does not belong on Wiki. She's a no name actress. Looks like it was written by a PR person. Come on- this is crap Bellatarr (talk)

A page cannot be deleted simply because a reader/user/editor does not like it or like the subject of the page or because it is poorly written. (I can agree that the page is not up to Wikipedia quality and has some puffery, at least, but that is cause someone who is interested in improving the article editing the page, not for its deletion. I have tagged the page for cleanup.) The article has sources which appear to be neutral and reliable. I am not an administrator and cannot delete the page in any event. The page does not meet the criteria for criteria for speedy deletion. I checked a source and it was not copyrighted. If any material violates a copyright from any other sources, that material could be deleted without going through a deletion process. The source of the copyrighted material should be identified in the edit summary or on the talk page with a mention in the edit summary so the removal can be verified as legitimate. See Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Otherwise, if you wish to have the page deleted, you must proceed under the procedures shown in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. For criteria, see: Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Given the subject's notice by the sources cited on the page, I think you might have difficulty establishing she is not notable under the general notability guidelines but you are welcome to try. See Wikipedia:Notability (people).
Other Wikipedia policy or guideline pages that may be useful to you in editing or writing for Wikipedia include: Wikipedia:List of policies; Wikipedia:List of guidelines; The five pillars of Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; and Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style. Help:Contents provides guidance and links to pages where help can be requested. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages (but not article edits) by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 09:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply