Beejaylee991

July 2024

Hello, I'm SuperMarioOdyssy101. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 06:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Demographics of Saint Paul, Minnesota, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

@Magnolia677 Why is ever demographic mentioned except for the black population? this extremely racist and bias in my opinion. what reliable source is needed to comfort the black population plays a significant role in the demographic of the city? there are more African Americans than Mexicans but Mexicans are mentioned. billshit, utterly racism and denialism Beejaylee991 (talk) 22:33, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

@Magnolia677 You are gonna have to give me a GREAT reason or I'll keep adding it, or remove the Mexican section. Beejaylee991 (talk) 22:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Please see WP:UNSOURCED. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

@Magnolia677 So, it needs to be verified that are black people in saint paul than Mexicans but Mexicans are mentioned in the demographic article...boy i tell yeah, America, good Amerikkka Beejaylee991 (talk) 23:20, 6 August 2024 (UTC)