User talk:Bedford/sandbox

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 03:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 21:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC).

---

• Doncram (talk · contribs · logs)

---

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

Since the beginning of July, User:Doncram has been stalking me. Of the 35 edits in July he made on on Template talk:Did you know, only six did not involve me, and almost every one was him trying to disqualify one of my articles, which he did not do to anyone else. (As we are talking 29 instance, I am not now linking to each one, but will if need be). He was pointy in trying to get an article of mine deleted, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montana in the American Civil War, making it clear the only reason why was because my name is on it. Similarly, regarding the Idaho equivalent, he post on ACW task force trying to stir sentiment against me, and strongly supported something I'm against regarding the naming of the Idaho in ACW article, when the only ACW articles he deals with are those I work on. Even now he's trying to disqualify many of my articles on TT:DYK, and he does not bother with any other articles. You do not see me trying to hamper any article writing of his, or even fool with anything he's working on, but he does not share this courtesy. I want him forbidden from working or commenting on any of my articles, . It is difficult to want to add anything to WP if I am constantly being bothered like this.

Desired outcome

I wish for Doncram to quit stalking me, This is accomplished by him being forbidden from commenting on any DYK hook I create or nominate. Also, he is not allowed to add anything involving articles in which I am a principle writer.

Description

Doncram needs to learn he can't boss me around and continue to harass me. Unlike him, I wish to be productive on WP, but it is difficult when I have him harassing me.

Evidence of disputed behavior

The various July attacks on me; (only 5 of his edits on TT:DYK in July did not involve me).

1. [1]
2. [2]
3. [3]
4. [4]
5. [5]
6. [6]
7. [7]
8. [8]
9. [9]
10. [10]
11. [11] Slightly different, as he wanted to get involved in an article I ixnayed due to it being non-neutral.
12. [12]
13. [13] Once again, related to trying to qualify a bad article
14. [14]
15. [15]
16. [16]
17. [17]
18. [18]
19. [19]
20. [20]
21. [21]
22. [22]
23. [23]
24. [24]
25. [25]
26. [26]
27. [27]

Also, every one he has done since August 14th were to derail one of my nominations, including striking out favorable reviews of my articles [28], but complains when his are given similar treatment.

Plus, attacks of me on my user page that preceded this

1. [29]
2. [30]
3. [31]

He then filed an AfD for the Montana in the American Civil War article I created, where many saw the only reason is was listed was because I wrote it and Doncram had no reasons to list it other than to attack me. It ended with 11 keeps, with Doncram the only oppsoe(As its done, I'll just post the link to th AfD).

Also, for someone who has no previous interest in the ACW [32] he sure gets involved when it involves me, only joining the ACW task force [33] after harassing me on that page and other ACW pages

1. [34]
2. [35]
3. [36]

Not to mention attacking me on WT:DYK

1. [37]

Plus stalking me on a page I tagged for problems, although I hope it does become good as it looks like a nice addition to Wikipedia: [38]

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. Wikipedia:Civility
2. Wikipedia:Edit war
3. Wikipedia:Harassment

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. An attempt made by Hellboy2hell (talk · contribs) that was deleted
2. An attempt by BusterD (talk · contribs) that was ignored
3. An attempt by Nrswanson (talk · contribs) after Doncram attacked one of the articles I nominated being successful.

User:Daniel also asked him once to stop looking at y articles; I was unable to find the link.

A new policy of DYK formatting was done, in User:Gatoclass's words, to stop this between myself and Doncram. Obviously, it failed; I was unable to find the link.

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute)

1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montana in the American Civil War
2. [39]

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

1. --King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 04:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.