Becker, Ruth

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephan Zipfel (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephan Zipfel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 14:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Becker, Ruth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 14:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Becker, Ruth. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Stephan Zipfel, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, DoubleGrazing, I can understand why you see a conflict of interest there - I do know Stephan Zipfel personally. I thougt it would be easiest to write my first article about someone I know. I did however check all the information with sources and put them as citations.

Does that mean that my article has no chance of being published? Or could it be rewritten/reviewed by a person, that is impartial?

Thank you, Ruth Becker Becker, Ruth (talk) 10:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

No, this absolutely does not mean that the article couldn't be published (in fact, I'm minded to accept it, as the person seems likely notable): writing about a topic that you have a COI in is not forbidden, although it is discouraged, because it can be very difficult to remain neutral about something you are familiar with. That said, I think you've actually managed that pretty well, as I cannot really find anything wrong with this draft.

You need to disclose your COI, however; you can find the instructions for doing that above, in the third bullet point ('disclose'). You can add your disclosure either on your own user page, or on the talk page of the article(s) in question, or both. I would also advise you to read the above message carefully and generally familiarise yourself with the COI guidelines.

One more thing: because this is an article on a living person (WP:BLP), referencing must be done with particular care. Every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal and family details must be clearly supported by immediate inline citations to reliable published sources. This means that at the start of the lead section, where you give this person's DOB, there should be a citation immediately after the closing bracket, but there isn't, and the next citation that follows doesn't provide this information, which means that the DOB remains unreferenced. Similarly, the first sentence in the 'Life' section states that "Zipfel studied Medicine in Heidelberg, Frankfurt am Main and London", but this is also unreferenced. If you could please go through the text and add supporting citations where necessary, or else remove anything that cannot be supported by a reliable published source, I would then be happy to accept this draft. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

thank you very much for explaining. I will disclose my Coi and make the necessary amendments to the article as soon as I find the time. Becker, Ruth (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello DoubleGrazing,

I added a Disclosure of COI to the talk page of the draft. Is this sufficient?

I also added some references to support some details and removed others, where I couldn't find a reference online. I verified the date and place of birth with Stephan Zipfel, but as the only other source I found online only stated the year, I only wrote born 1962.

Thank you very much for your help. Please let me know if there is anything else, I need to do.

Ruth Becker Becker, Ruth (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephan Zipfel has been accepted

Stephan Zipfel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)